From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC50A0350; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:19:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FA35F69; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:19:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EDF5F69 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:19:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1593094752; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sSpPaODY4OkAg6m1zL/kPdKsjdQzoWpuRCUwu/UkLZE=; b=Y8h1SIIqpHnj82QVV27X3OjJZN2mu0rRqGl/cvt3BmnW7Hj5VUwcXbAybUt5XI+AnY6iS1 OeZQa5x4DZgguqVgzl3jhu+eTA1S03NHNc2beLtIohtMenrWSmw5DzSXF1Y9vTU8MD98sn LGuisiGvXPkgVquin2DbacKwqmnTNDA= Received: from mail-ua1-f72.google.com (mail-ua1-f72.google.com [209.85.222.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-174-t-ANqwQoO0ml84W_l2_1tg-1; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 10:19:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: t-ANqwQoO0ml84W_l2_1tg-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f72.google.com with SMTP id d21so711054uan.7 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:19:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sSpPaODY4OkAg6m1zL/kPdKsjdQzoWpuRCUwu/UkLZE=; b=h+IF2qL5BQIjw6wSmbZOw3TKaQ3COyN3lWQXUlAMB77xXNs/ZgOEl27cBi7YVnx4Wu JgaShpe3jTy/YdZfLCvNA4bvLwv9eye2+u7fEb818NAYelT36TdQLrYCR6d0XY4bwJeT eD4L7EEFN1Xknptvn+vL0GmeNZm9qN9/0dPSbfAyriluPFCzwXndpqHv4cfmxEYYXGJT cdXM83Yq1/UUzvDcwCAgngMVSaxrbbz5ykTLT/ups4f/RF7jAdv4C8B1vbo3OZ2n0KQj kUnVPxdRGcDusdBllGyyu8g3sswp6NCbg5iwbsY1bf7rYS8cMA7peGmCNpZoTE87o7EJ VPEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530iuCpTOQ9/PN1z1B2CUfQmMmoTJwWxz7fRZ9IzNTBKgQBVhdkh uPSbXQSXQwOrWTxVbIwonttxVwt/3fP1u4/6foyoKLIqqthYTsQ6rU/2eZUG/PTMLiIadJIQ5cu vNyu3ikXDy+xYCqY2UdE= X-Received: by 2002:a67:2fc6:: with SMTP id v189mr11266421vsv.198.1593094746687; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:19:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJykRf0qTqro7juCztzLHza3AmpyFQO0OhcqkCYACcuaeFhBsN2a1m+nmZ+5AWvgLkYinfz15EMb9RvXD/JytHA= X-Received: by 2002:a67:2fc6:: with SMTP id v189mr11266401vsv.198.1593094746495; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:19:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:18:55 +0200 Message-ID: To: Thierry MARTIN Cc: dev X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] bus/pci: fix VF bus error for memory access X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:59 PM Thierry MARTIN wrote: > > Tested-by: Thierry MARTIN > Thanks for testing. The only issue is that this mail is missing a in-reply-to reference, but I added your tag when applying the fix. -- David Marchand