From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC68A04B8; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:41:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1E11D66D; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:41:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E2B1D669 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:41:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1588696888; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cQ5d1JWTG+0tRWlbNYasSoq3cUmDL3LuYwkVUUh/cEE=; b=LlD/LoIdtk3TK/Yk2LWxXo1zCEi3TOICp22rUdVi8ru2+S2u45QX6aaukClCm3h3yzLlNO W0uYw0wxX2MrSd1qXWtOu+xXq0xACOpvGqteGGvtCKJLeumMeJLra+IF2Spp1dDRCx3JKF eVC8W1bj9VB7tLCSJvauAFJRJNjHagY= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-373-T1zd96p_MLuQ8oTSoGNe6w-1; Tue, 05 May 2020 12:41:25 -0400 X-MC-Unique: T1zd96p_MLuQ8oTSoGNe6w-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id a22so669840vsl.18 for ; Tue, 05 May 2020 09:41:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RmvBxvxsQIRvyiVQcEW2DUUL8rUfiopKeo80hq5XHlc=; b=awb9lkxUM75bj4QgG6jf3OGbQGA4YAIx0Me4hEUds4g8z+rH1Ufhv2XidS8pX6WiQn 7btK7PUFF7HSNa/OXgJqNkDyw5w79bUO9KV2jkqwrTJywfm6XzVufYvi/3NqPzZwhUMy ks31TrvTHFY0kH66fvpiEzBPzowQRYoA/5fK/W3+QB6Hc01HHqdX3pYaT4ZNFY/a1YGt UyT3U5lNIH1Y55eSOFMU5jNz8ycrZPACKsg8KCxI6Shte8TPcKz231HREotxhxmsd8Pb QSM1Niyd5CjqByl4zyMkdJvYunaJNMkWAAHiGZoAm1uNFnExLRRVai9e/BXAduf/ptJ/ Gsmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZP3eILQ1zqFn/LsRNGGkwyjVOYQVKeFU5pKastJPepNAo1434U Occ0DV18VaFlgnbDgiR1K4/bwPrTBFsYilGPRIKmiGuuN/ap02z1MOP0dZ61b93GtIhdJUN7Y6k eKSuc/McgCv242lmY9l8= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:2141:: with SMTP id t1mr3277822ual.86.1588696884954; Tue, 05 May 2020 09:41:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypK/7lsxM7Xqn7DeQmBwVk0nc6Ae51MeRzc2p/cHKBqzRgYQvevVLPlsSNxezpzOWHWSqkQmYmXCxsFsHgRD4qY= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:2141:: with SMTP id t1mr3277796ual.86.1588696884664; Tue, 05 May 2020 09:41:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200504174552.6700-1-drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200504210347.24094-1-drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <18ecc473-3d80-a232-963f-19e34c021e72@intel.com> <8f6efd02-741d-b606-3749-cae90da3be44@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <8f6efd02-741d-b606-3749-cae90da3be44@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 18:41:13 +0200 Message-ID: To: David Christensen Cc: Ferruh Yigit , dev , =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Krawczyk?= , Marcin Wojtas , "Tzalik, Guy" , Evgeny Schemeilin , Igor Chauskin , Andrew Rybchenko X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix rte_memcpy build on ppc with gcc 9.3 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:32 PM David Christensen w= rote: > >> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/ppc/include/rte_memcpy.h b/lib/librte_eal/= ppc/include/rte_memcpy.h > >> index 25311ba1d..de47a5d2e 100644 > >> --- a/lib/librte_eal/ppc/include/rte_memcpy.h > >> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/ppc/include/rte_memcpy.h > >> @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ > >> > >> #include > >> #include > >> -/*To include altivec.h, GCC version must >=3D 4.8 */ > >> -#include > >> +#include "rte_altivec.h" > >> +#include "rte_common.h" > > > > I can't find "rte_altivec.h", am I missing something. > > > > With just ignoring "-Warray-bounds" changes, I confirm ena build issue = is fixed > > with gcc 9.1 > > The rte_altivec.h is related to another open patch required to build on > POWER systems (http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/69605/) that's waiting to > be accepted. You may not have encountered it if you're not building the > MLX5 PMD which has additional library requirements. Is there a point in having two patches? --=20 David Marchand