From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0200EA04B5; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:13:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B756F1C433; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:13:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02981C2FB for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:13:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600272810; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5QOsnICDPMkkuOncZgnmyak/DX+DGYOvI4ts97XO+Io=; b=DxjnhQtsQmkhZTAtpVBQc1782W41J+T2lwD2ltHQEVrY9FYUCKRiejeVXFrJbxm4swWP7i VIQemRP7TU87YA9Jp1bttevEaKvdDRDuh4wBOy8UeeyCjh8UEa6mTAptvjaa8nNSlonbR3 Br5jT8EeCnyZy0gL6mOiYfKVigG1MJE= Received: from mail-vk1-f200.google.com (mail-vk1-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-524-bB0Tl8GcOCGn1etewbxVTg-1; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:13:27 -0400 X-MC-Unique: bB0Tl8GcOCGn1etewbxVTg-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id 186so1615013vku.4 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:13:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5QOsnICDPMkkuOncZgnmyak/DX+DGYOvI4ts97XO+Io=; b=dw24c6R9EWRWvhuDepmy/brtYFQpcoOTKZ6iRrbeF5XSUEk/TVvLnx56bLE5YZspLV V0AWQLhaVDpMz4pHubF4t0kPOukqJttE8y7ZoYN4E3eXXR3BpvcEC57c2hlzQsrM5FxV 2bv8Jf6M/Vp+Wh5bFfs7f2PjItaTKihSMVXxMjWmoukTScjqq8ySSgrWOiXmgGk/mRVY 1Df7ssbZaqjCCHPbrckKgz/qaWDlVcZZsjTfObIhWEACq74sqZR9eEo6nayL/a5XGqPN VSGZBmsH8Eh6HFLMDnCE9KEyWOLvfM34BMUZCA7NJYj1T/Q0gF+QoUBRJkoOMoI17AEL 2tlg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530blQ29B0XMm4/cIVQWSj9VpyMDvjxuvTzNMEvoWsWd0Yabp8S4 N6qu64Q80KRmjM4gIjt61jcZZccS4pZhLz48nav5YQs9KM3FgXRvxT5BgkLETwRSgfbU9DeRMqu olFov+yM5d703c+PCS4k= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e2c2:: with SMTP id i2mr15042066vsm.27.1600272806645; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:13:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz0+l2aeJ18bj2JmSChsMsk2BugKg7SNMnuyzhTNkCtj5IOMNrsrWLg0K62Kqry/KWB667egJCxj+BbGJoIukU= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e2c2:: with SMTP id i2mr15042042vsm.27.1600272806456; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:13:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1598258441-15696-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> <1599801997-19880-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <1599801997-19880-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:13:15 +0200 Message-ID: To: Phil Yang Cc: dev , Honnappa Nagarahalli , "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" , Joyce Kong , nd , Thomas Monjalon , "Yigit, Ferruh" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] remove RTE CIO barriers X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 7:26 AM Phil Yang wrote: > > Since rte_cio_*mb APIs have been deprecated[1], remove them and use > rte_io_*mb APIs instead. > > [1] http://code.dpdk.org/dpdk/latest/source/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst#L100 > > v2: > Update 20.11 release note by adding these API change announcement. (Honnappa) Copying Thomas and Ferruh for info, as this change is likely to generate some merging noise (I can see new rte_cio_* calls in next-net). Phil, you must remove the associated deprecation notice as part of this change. A single patch is enough since the change is mechanical and the rte_io_ barriers are already equivalent. Yet, I would remind in the commitlog that this is possible now that ARMv8 IO barriers behave the same as the others arches. Thanks. -- David Marchand