From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F7E4688A; Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:50:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDB84065C; Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:50:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52D140656 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:50:57 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1749124257; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=j9An2RWHJ4sczRireU3wYmzHSJ6JKdZOXV/nz9Yo6iU=; b=VTQRKuVAAonqhCklB405F0a4z1NK/NCBqMNRUrpQt0EDPyF8SWEdQ2NG0t8vSITDf5T6ot ti14n8He08D7oEx+hHXzE8rB7Lb/ScXNMf/zVSVzsEoE8+9XXQajNdcQQYN23gHjrZVaXO AvYCuGCcc6KrO1PW1zehI+XWdJYtw/A= Received: from mail-lf1-f69.google.com (mail-lf1-f69.google.com [209.85.167.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-606-zXPBPrjMPQ6uXFcPpRJ24Q-1; Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:50:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: zXPBPrjMPQ6uXFcPpRJ24Q-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: zXPBPrjMPQ6uXFcPpRJ24Q_1749124253 Received: by mail-lf1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5532f32cbdfso436640e87.3 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:50:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1749124253; x=1749729053; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=j9An2RWHJ4sczRireU3wYmzHSJ6JKdZOXV/nz9Yo6iU=; b=sfkv+8ksjD63TcBcFoZrUdty34Gls8HySDLI4K+6iF9mtielkC/9gI1c8bCu54gzz6 Pag1CYaxMX+oYPaWTXdg9q7TFfXSK54ef+wKwdlWUPiTTeR+8AD69FrDgKQeYk08hLSn Aei9/g7UVIdNnSfqhXkat1VBcQwNdtXopP9VWmweHTSwBv3zxoM1m9svMQjuG9QG4G+v utJiwLMBRWbrdIf8RO19KDKqVnEV9FB1qKxTq5Xw+kgVsCQwnixLqH5lcOpGrCrBT4rl TCRuFkkLQ/D/AiTQ4Tx7tkcL8hP0x808x/MV+BiBXnPnsAtnKa8JIIxw5Ijg33acBDbg zKNA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyLFBil75SKOcccAXLWEDb7lhDQVbNJRv83QsDkEazj/txBA1Dz 6684psHq+fd1MZl7QBqbnglp7kymXjeWFgKlkvOFA1B0FspBi/Hoor0wYFJSbgR3O7MWYj/ZZZH rmOowzNFTAoWYZeefeQxNE0DTDMSk7+c+zzCDJfJyXIEBNKgv+beeMZfLJjpC9/79g5blqEHIAl NKSE+/QrM7h1JTM+n2nIM= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuTZoLc+wwREXgtfGLr4gkoP7fVdVF5DX08pDcSsUYqTisdavFLwhsGULK9dVj 6njUCenWzNmiJ0nSi5fpll9jX9ACwmHzFop+JdDrcK5xc683rXxhIqC6MgplbdrXQOvnhItk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3f0c:b0:553:2cc1:2bba with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-55356bf60d8mr2194745e87.31.1749124252862; Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEFaOYuIQUkS81gVZ77CX2/yKKpSxtWjwlES6iiNPRbaInxhFjyVoz7b1ASkzWcKMeY7SDM1oql0Id/tsvFRAs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3f0c:b0:553:2cc1:2bba with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-55356bf60d8mr2194737e87.31.1749124252447; Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250605113552.918120-1-eperezma@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20250605113552.918120-1-eperezma@redhat.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:50:41 +0200 X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFtsXVQgPhBZuQyQVM1xvpbEChcZeW9AJxx5Z_rONeyAfXl10h7_KJoIxYY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Search the split vq desc and avail in RO areas To: =?UTF-8?Q?Eugenio_P=C3=A9rez?= Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Chenbo Xia , stable@dpdk.org, Maxime Coquelin X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: sDQwGUkjnLX1M_7q1B8XFv1zgQg7AthBY4XMwsH8n6Y_1749124253 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 1:36=E2=80=AFPM Eugenio P=C3=A9rez wrote: > > QEMU's shadow virtqueue and VDUSE exposes these areas as read-only. If > we don't change it, vhost_iova_to_vva do not consider them as valid and > returns that they're not found. > > Eugenio P=C3=A9rez (2): > vhost: search the split vq desc and avail in RO areas > vhost: search the packed vq driver area in RO areas > > lib/vhost/vhost.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) At a quick glance, no need for two patches. Sorry, the implication of this issue is not clear to me. What is the impact from a user pov? --=20 David Marchand