From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57741A0547; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:08:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C556100C; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:08:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1848F72 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:08:22 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1581692901; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Z/r8wJFinA5VEWdshTJ2ld2it5LCQhcHRzYyu5yxyDk=; b=g9LlRva3yyKH2UpWkjyOABXVu3/a5bAWfIIyJgfti3XVrCzG3YvPTY33cFFxrRsxZm+3sE PNziF87rMt9RFcKm4SQUGuX319EA6JCS6QMfWUOOYR3BOSC8+Xmn4CdVm7eUXnxVCB0e+U mrnV2DWb8joh4VDaHc0A+Io08x5onzk= Received: from mail-ua1-f71.google.com (mail-ua1-f71.google.com [209.85.222.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-44-i3BNCNf-NGm3z1ir4T_s5g-1; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:08:16 -0500 Received: by mail-ua1-f71.google.com with SMTP id u11so941142ual.5 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 07:08:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h4SmWzSFcAbNxfvPcSB8IgESNrB0yOpNv3d3bgdW428=; b=YBc6qRTLvZI2UBn6c4q3t0TS5fgmz4NTzpLaExVQwlAU7NI9am+L854T8NuF1fCSi5 nNVm+OHVJVAMtNdSn8+R3qpjD/LwdL7+SKlYs1afBZy73nPIXi+VtCw3CGEAadaA794/ hq22PtxJHlDVMQ12Vf7xexgTAGjRW2nmSfNLSEBFeOSfJSXf0P/nVVK8qVOTYtw+qCHT hoVrpeson1s699posbCO5Z9fO6GSc340Axn+N2S616Xgtp6D2kno5HjIhZ7ufzcumFr0 gYzQOqMvRYJs5QUHlMCK1CV8OLvzfPnD1fY1zaOAT8p8wDTJZidG0Tr9cGOuy+B4/Ogj vLug== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW1gCRFN3HM72ULU79CUSyZJMcZQrptDL94gacHmjfg9dmg3BbM BkNXSic6eXtE5Q3C/trkfip4C+VjsBzibu/fNnIjlpYzu/wcxHu6bb5DefItQF1geIniKsuUCR2 mC5c7Vsx1itBljo5qc/A= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6796:: with SMTP id v22mr1736521uar.41.1581692895557; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 07:08:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw6iK9MCRs4UIvW3isPd0HK4q+siO8HWq0ZWLhEvyXi/d9gdD3gUEU/R3s4CO1eOv4WW6Z97pJcs/6tWl3AU4E= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6796:: with SMTP id v22mr1736499uar.41.1581692895108; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 07:08:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191113214346.33749-1-yasufum.o@gmail.com> <20191127084826.3519-1-yasufum.o@gmail.com> <20191127084826.3519-2-yasufum.o@gmail.com> <2dc8c11a-ec17-7b26-b79e-bed4e6063f6b@intel.com> <6ea0b73a-1d38-dbe1-2142-9ab4fec594e7@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6ea0b73a-1d38-dbe1-2142-9ab4fec594e7@gmail.com> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:08:03 +0100 Message-ID: To: Yasufumi Ogawa , Thomas Monjalon Cc: "Burakov, Anatoly" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , dev X-MC-Unique: i3BNCNf-NGm3z1ir4T_s5g-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 8:46 AM Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: > > Hi, > > Could I confirm that this patch is going to be merged in 20.02? Sorry, but I can't take this patch in 20.02. It breaks compilation on FreeBSD. http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2019-November/109435.html I am still unconvinced on the need to change the size to something so huge to accommodate with this new use case (secondary processes in containers). Why can't we truncate the container hostname so that it fits in 64 bytes? Thomas, opinion? --=20 David Marchand