From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F50425FF; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 13:42:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991A6402D2; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 13:42:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0651402B5 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 13:42:08 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1695296528; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RC3uzh8VjO0z0HBQ1FTgkqx94bAg0hTbHjMMbVYQCKc=; b=RNzRYhP22XhAlNfrjL5Swii7Vs/fhQ1cLvuL6rWaeDyVRTCwRJJbJq/EpSw3Nxj63zAkWI HZzBNsDvBaPG5KOcIomao/nsC32nGil0t8yN274maq2lsTEL9wBP+4P7akSYPB/rOV+a4q Usj7POZdr8nivfiNtoIbg+gCQfaNLlQ= Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (mail-lj1-f200.google.com [209.85.208.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-311-qVobQPXcOLKT2UueEHpHag-1; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 07:42:06 -0400 X-MC-Unique: qVobQPXcOLKT2UueEHpHag-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2ba1949656bso10196531fa.0 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 04:42:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695296525; x=1695901325; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RC3uzh8VjO0z0HBQ1FTgkqx94bAg0hTbHjMMbVYQCKc=; b=QOHWiS35lzrU5vlrRlauP2IP20PX/WwXnJy9GoSSVSc3HGFnyFdjeeaYJTwaSX6Aeg +e5jgbVtbdt3WU7EuHM9K+kiSNBwtkmoukPWa4YwwvL0fxtqC0n+4l7EGtBnyAPn8+je HQIPZ+pXdnoj5LbI4q/kyg0ZTeXM7ldta/wBV4lTQ5J2+TEhnee/LHc1ojUzK2Zv2Iqc 0bCzRvgzTgONXQb5QfT8RZ+wGPNRx5auX95yUa/ShV7CuoS/gHjfvRmScucMS4zCxi6V ScmsEnylU1cdTCPIvg0CSIv9mSsuP7RtrnBwT715db2zaVjM41BPvjgIqe72mB5YPDb6 GTpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzr/AZ8tDA7Gg5YRix/qo5ebqkIxKvng/6+3momUTpJKiPFBQbd E31wROCZa0TyJJB0cSxt00PHb0qto+/eMO3GWPx6Ogh/LoHh7YfIbX9DbDl9KkERr+KW3NGfoGe o4qSxYpGCO2yiss5z8Kc= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3003:0:b0:2c0:20e3:9905 with SMTP id w3-20020a2e3003000000b002c020e39905mr4853648ljw.21.1695296525361; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 04:42:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF7+TiE4HF9G+o+R9sEZ4S93W8ILPEwdZKPXpFd7RoJIX22BLOu6pWJeje4+/xtQrjG5y/zP9JlY7vNC6LEHos= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3003:0:b0:2c0:20e3:9905 with SMTP id w3-20020a2e3003000000b002c020e39905mr4853633ljw.21.1695296525069; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 04:42:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230919034427.9098-1-chenbo.xia@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 13:41:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] maintainers: update email address To: Patrick Robb Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole , Thomas Monjalon , Ferruh Yigit , Bruce Richardson X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 5:39=E2=80=AFPM Patrick Robb wr= ote: > > Recheck-request: iol-unit-amd64-testing > > A maintainers file change should not cause eal_flags_misc_autotest to fai= l, so I'm queuing a retest for this series. I agree ;-). About this failure here, I had a look at the logs: this is something new and I noticed the same failure on a patch of mine too this week. I see that a secondary process crashes and some log about a failing rte_memzone_free(). """ EAL: Memzone is not allocated """ which may indicative of a double free() in some cleanup or a race between secondary/primary process or a rare-to-reach branch of the code.... I don't have time to look into it, so simply mentionning what I saw if someone wants to investigate. --=20 David Marchand