From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk1-f172.google.com (mail-vk1-f172.google.com [209.85.221.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711B63977 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 13:48:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-vk1-f172.google.com with SMTP id s184so336811vkd.6 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 04:48:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pwDhJFEv9jU+pbQutVD26LD7FZVGpyVJsO7/6sPz3nk=; b=emmdKeN2w6XCKEFQO8Dp7b/QTRINIeNSzNmZHNIbeZhbI8B+a9RSXP/W6MNSqvFnvo rKShxWSOTsnXE5RNsKqnVU6ueuieB/0a9p8ttOvrShR0aesj/XUfZIcEtkELP+TQLYBH YkpmuM2H/WSdTY3mLLoV2JvM1Z3j9mkfLEmBuRQM+vGyjIr+xrNBmwiv8T/K3nYLeiMJ Guvd/rUdzqcvRB3+NpjEPR6Uhg09XU+XfxcXpVdom7GntSb+hAMKRvEc/ywjdzA+ELQP FmPtDTC/sjwynJtMQa9xM2oOtSLNqw6QZMDz0mJxJPY2+tZ+do5VANyRk3fpPDts8jkj VSgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWa5UpCYwyxlqhN4pZU9+s191psBLfB7yoj0QLsJ239ofVv1LfmJ EALSC9XFqh+m1FBpOaJx4jNEKknhuq/REcTHb9vRgA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VdB6KeMoNvcwxF3g7K8vevpyQ7wBhCFVr39Y4A6uJ3OEB9IYD2RpnA/DEE/k6CId1ooESfJQcqQUwRnG29KI4= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:b58d:: with SMTP id e135mr11489254vkf.86.1545310081796; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 04:48:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181220104246.5590-1-gavin.hu@arm.com> <20181220104246.5590-5-gavin.hu@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20181220104246.5590-5-gavin.hu@arm.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 13:47:50 +0100 Message-ID: To: Gavin Hu Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon , jerinj@marvell.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, nd@arm.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/5] spinlock: move the implementation to arm specific file X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 12:48:02 -0000 On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:44 AM Gavin Hu wrote: > remove the hard code #ifdef RTE_FORCE_INTRINSICS, move the implementation > to the arm specific file, x86 and POWER have their own implementations. > No, x86 and ppc define their own implementation when _not_ having RTE_FORCE_INTRINSICS. -- David Marchand