From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90816A053D; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:19:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED1B1BF7C; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:19:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4AD1BF7C for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:19:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1594999167; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=d1eslXiOC9RW8suPWnXMNjwdm5duVRs7X+TcTzo5+Ok=; b=L8EPOIqRuoHnYMdZU/hlrtFkpU8+VDtfbq4fJ4iziGTBNORxa8rkvc5hW/VOx6khO8yGFH +HlvCpv+0Wru1x0X+LEUnGqZ/0EXekTPUmGXg9ycxUFOr82JqaqTISCH6IoQLujPfMRlVS oaT6f4bYuv+M4YrcZfz4xyEwbKtCROI= Received: from mail-vs1-f71.google.com (mail-vs1-f71.google.com [209.85.217.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-379-DqdvrKbFMKCzRoRimons8Q-1; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:19:14 -0400 X-MC-Unique: DqdvrKbFMKCzRoRimons8Q-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f71.google.com with SMTP id d15so1826302vsr.14 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:19:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=d1eslXiOC9RW8suPWnXMNjwdm5duVRs7X+TcTzo5+Ok=; b=PVaAwGAFV0hFVeptRlkcw3+MdZDrsbC0wN4QdPj6OxbaxyghHXZrgphkNdevSrH+N4 +DaRTs71cGPCZ3gQVmcOERMnK+9EV/dXCCgf5fQ3eTDyxBlPAakda5R550rt6A2wHHx4 v4+PSCHaqh51Hyx+WKCyOYG54jIoHSs59EhX1wO8b5hLcrmB6z/7ayv+vQfL/fTpB2e4 UpBP6NrtNz5fWwpYe7bZ4kfAM+aPm+8meRu14KhMlu1rj7XRIwIFEH/nRXXmhgFJdqfM aRpZBkf5SkR3/yllR2wsZl4EJyKV+RiFLGBdWHYvpmvmLBz2Ls/3cCMp1zStxI2SDgUM bV7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530A0TOXqkhzRE4LkEEVBRXjW4yzxbtTUknll6EctFyaQ1dEl7qQ EpEPZQzkqDzd1F5n4vBkpTKwKzsWSq9vKgga0+En63G5Vm7xSuH6h4NnK6fFIOBqF2rr+obQvn+ T63hoO8zrc56rRHcn+Gk= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:2b8d:: with SMTP id y13mr7885296uai.126.1594999154263; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:19:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyd8cmJLYl5hvZPKXRJaNTanScKTyLfSJ1kcEYe8P3co2UAjyGL4Efu3baI3evO/zXm3z8OXPhNAmARIPi6Ksg= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:2b8d:: with SMTP id y13mr7885272uai.126.1594999153940; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:19:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6d0bf076-c9bd-564c-20f6-ba8a49bc2389@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:19:02 +0200 Message-ID: To: Van Haaren Harry , Lukasz Wojciechowski Cc: Igor Romanov , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Phil Yang , dev , Aaron Conole , Ferruh Yigit X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Random failure in service_autotest X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:56 AM David Marchand wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 12:41 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > > > On 7/15/2020 11:14 AM, David Marchand wrote: > > > Hello Harry and guys who touched the service code recently :-) > > > > > > I spotted a failure for the service UT in Travis: > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/361097992#L18697 > > > > > > I found only a single instance of this failure and tried to reproduce > > > it with my usual "brute" active loop with no success so far. > > > > +1, I didn't able to reproduce it in my environment but observed it in the > > Travis CI. > > > > > > > > Any chance it could be due to recent changes? > > > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=f3c256b621262e581d3edcca383df83875ab7ebe > > > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=048db4b6dcccaee9277ce5b4fbb2fe684b212e22 > > I can see more occurrences of the issue in the CI. > I just applied the patch changing the log level for test assert, in > the hope it will help. And... we just got one with logs: https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/362109882#L18948 EAL: Test assert service_lcore_attr_get line 396 failed: lcore_attr_get() didn't get correct loop count (zero) It looks like a race between the service core still running and the core resetting the loops attr. -- David Marchand