From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F75FA00C4; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 10:34:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EF54021F; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 10:34:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA3E40141 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 10:34:38 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1658910878; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MUpQ9Tjchg/3xqcXrwHJwIpbGMbcW80L1pUkYjDXCXQ=; b=g4/WmQnCArX9ASt7zcT8kDC1kfzzYIJmuMmawTW5hJzVTb9ycke8HeoOxVfJy9Qhi9qR1q 4d8M1I7+jTnM3+6pdr39knay2O03xntUrwGEst8MjarBehzc5ifaEkv8CitZvx/4RGa/ub 5bmozlCtS/vbzzBHR1V78rEAYvBIgYc= Received: from mail-lf1-f69.google.com (mail-lf1-f69.google.com [209.85.167.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-556-LHqfZEU8N7mcKtCsAsmdjA-1; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 04:34:36 -0400 X-MC-Unique: LHqfZEU8N7mcKtCsAsmdjA-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f69.google.com with SMTP id p36-20020a05651213a400b004779d806c13so5094107lfa.10 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 01:34:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MUpQ9Tjchg/3xqcXrwHJwIpbGMbcW80L1pUkYjDXCXQ=; b=AHkajutdOI4kqIEJF4B+p6N39PvHoQ6ilyLZq+XhjvBWOQGiBYBFOIIa5Hv9mB98sW LaGPhwGnMbAVWdOXmlDTWSCUOlNzhdkndsXx9smwE/4xwKZdNDfjAviLCB/f53Hzn41m 5Gr/jzI37aw3825wXA5wwoh4xQFCK+7EQtVTOcXBdDj5ptzW48cgNtNAw9Wm69kdFPmQ PXa7/AS9oXtxB+oIFZkD8jlN9Y+yLSor/aCVcvYGERg1VCxNxnKOcq0DW3tjyEhw6YF6 LxA0XXIlKfgg+xweiNh/A7Q0RQCE/N5NV8RQtK5PzUpxyb8bP+xCuGXoDNM0X+GsqaFN gIWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora838oMzUWilI91f8T/IWl2zLXnhhdeAdzip9jusMTVXxUcB96VK ZFvQBofqlGa0AxTt97wHZwg/8Fgq339X+oTiCqVIrOq0rNXn7FWfnQZEz/ASMw3EA+qyyu6mSRf jRvv4aEwSM7eFKgd84NA= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9941:0:b0:25b:c885:3143 with SMTP id r1-20020a2e9941000000b0025bc8853143mr7686821ljj.477.1658910875369; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 01:34:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sGtPCLDrrKqqcqz+LJtRxMsVZ/sQioit6dosaGSq1r7lJllHo9LajDHIgqKEKbFxY05/S0A9rMqKKi6JoMDic= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9941:0:b0:25b:c885:3143 with SMTP id r1-20020a2e9941000000b0025bc8853143mr7686799ljj.477.1658910875037; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 01:34:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220727081352.1333695-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> <20220727081352.1333695-3-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20220727081352.1333695-3-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 10:34:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] crypto/ipsec_mb: enable IPsec on Arm platform To: Ruifeng Wang Cc: Fan Zhang , Pablo de Lara , "Wang, Yipeng1" , "Gobriel, Sameh" , Bruce Richardson , Vladimir Medvedkin , Akhil Goyal , dev , Honnappa Nagarahalli , nd , Thomas Monjalon Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 10:14 AM Ruifeng Wang wrote: > > Arm port of ipsec_mb library [1] has different header file name than > the Intel ipsec_mb library. Proper header name is picked according to > the architecture to get the code compile when ipsec_mb is installed on > Arm platform. > > And the Arm port currently supports ZUC and SNOW3g. Call to other > algorithms will be blocked. > > [1] https://gitlab.arm.com/arm-reference-solutions/ipsec-mb/-/tree/main Is it planned to get this port merged in the original repo? -- David Marchand