From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA2248A44; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:18:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAFF2402AE; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:18:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7D440270 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:18:10 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1761902290; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vuDINOMLd3SQH6869xuhD/l/uoRup+frK/bePHjolu8=; b=G3AL/DdrnXpwRiMu/LSgdNAhjyV8JHwWdwFq1esepHgwcoHKFEkVKEG2JcnMFOguy0/Bu2 F7wKkPA4PBhoaD24TjQFjqpiKmBRD2V6kBosi67lakeltWzPuRwxpHJdlmUDbP+npMpxEv v51lPSZwo+CZO9u7NOSl74vHB8gELOA= Received: from mail-lj1-f197.google.com (mail-lj1-f197.google.com [209.85.208.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-689-P1xr3C5LNkWs4dLruwRCug-1; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 05:18:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: P1xr3C5LNkWs4dLruwRCug-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: P1xr3C5LNkWs4dLruwRCug_1761902287 Received: by mail-lj1-f197.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-368ab6919e9so10780891fa.1 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 02:18:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1761902287; x=1762507087; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vuDINOMLd3SQH6869xuhD/l/uoRup+frK/bePHjolu8=; b=MsFsVN3FH0gnI/nY/qw31yIGWCS/qkNWb083Xvs7iXFfgjKxIOp2V/HmpY63h40OnB FjaVsFeNIwEMTMrUurySeX7aURAFd9W7Wd0pJkaaM/gzKlOA43CXxO6l+kICoNAig3Eg /xd4LRUF6QwyLfsSc1k3XGx8Aot+e44mzB7dkl8TwQFHgsg+RtwOxBzWypKzBbk02CWX HLnL/u9P9+QodkB4OKK1Kk87NadjS5p7y6zfOGPOAmhLdHnXHJPUK7dVDQb3x/CtDBGF r9eNrNcWyVsjdlCBTx0uLjEy4b6yHvWf8MzT5ou77FrJu0GKPIyLkwlfbWYK7pFJwEnM 3tLA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXMrvrxPusD94G+R1eJlEIb3+SxlKeScKineibA8l7mzuLgYT81zk/ID7MW+B1gZpQ+DiM=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx4glVR3if8AiErE2MkJ14G6+3EJ1hl4YHjiMqrbKjkHUWHycLE wlca4GczfqrYiJftYBPPgA6CqBe9070i+TXDBFSyB3wZMVum+Xc9ekTVjES0OIPItCryb01dFcu YFDpJDeaPIp1RbU7RwQ9iZQXTUZ5ksvdWpxLrNhnmNOTdAZ9tk4wAnUwHJs6O3U4QuTEUSj5ra6 i2jDOIl9VaEZqTRqQLlrs= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsl4Ft8lYsdflhRmP3MUIYsD1SShXs/AOGdZ40FXvKZFvE4ZjGfrbpt4ZZRIBs izBHJam6wXsjlQSAOYwKiwUUK+csa6eAFgfiXE0xwz87ZISyQD0GwKxKFWDYClIciNNDsZkc1nL SvQmqm3Db7Bp2QpL/EFDnQ5znxL8rKPrc96plZ6r9q1GIEZZtYzA0SbJ4org== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a593:0:b0:376:4320:e34c with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-37a18df596dmr8493761fa.46.1761902287303; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 02:18:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IErUlXnsg6aFwEvS6PO4YUDn4CY4uRZ9OVRT+YLiKfzKkA9bjOOkGGDPa7SgSGvcJBD9bka3xJ2mHdlgzOj2aE= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a593:0:b0:376:4320:e34c with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-37a18df596dmr8493641fa.46.1761902286885; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 02:18:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35F6551F@smartserver.smartshare.dk> In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35F6551F@smartserver.smartshare.dk> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:17:55 +0100 X-Gm-Features: AWmQ_bkMH-oXKrDLNlyQOtl3iopKvlOZkbTZSLfmdZggeqtFqfy3QOBDy2qrVcY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Disable SPDK testing again? To: =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=C3=B8rup?= Cc: Patrick Robb , Aaron Conole , dpdk-techboard , bruce.richardson@intel.com, ci@dpdk.org, dev X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: aIE9OEIbYDejSk9lGr3mLhShTwC2z5FfsEkN2x3L5vc_1761902287 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 at 10:11, Morten Br=C3=B8rup = wrote: > While it is just a warning in the CI dashboard, I don't think we > > should waste resources on this testing. > > Opinions? > > We should ask ourselves why they are doing that. > Is something wrong (or incomplete) with our handling of -Denable_libs? > Are we including unnecessary optional libs? > > It seems like they are using -Ddisable_libs, not -Denable_libs. Don't the= y know about -Denable_libs? I reached out to some SPDK dev when I was working on enable_libs. I also Cc: one of them on the patches but never got a reply. --=20 David Marchand