DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] remove component-specific logic for AVX builds
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 08:46:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8ynP9_b7DV=xR_s_b4u5Vkzh9G8ZGHEe8wQ6htGhqvwsQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z9sIGDafadtgB9gr@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>

Hello Bruce,

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 7:09 PM Bruce Richardson
<bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 05:29:30PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > A number of libs and drivers had special optimized AVX2 and AVX512 code
> > paths for performance reasons, and these tended to have copy-pasted
> > logic to build those files. Centralise that logic in the main
> > drivers/ and lib/ meson.build files to avoid duplication.
> >
> > v4: rebase on latest main branch
> >     minor fixes following feedback
> >     limit use of -march=skylake-avx512 to when we don't already have a
> >       -march flag supporting AVX512.
> > v3: add patch for event/dlb2 AVX512 handling.
> >     add common code for libraries as well as drivers.
> > v2: add patch 4 to remove use of unnecessary CC_AVX2_SUPPORT flag
> >
> A related follow-up to this patchset. Checking with "godbolt.org", it
> appears that both clang 3.6[1] and gcc 5[2] (the minimum called out compiler
> versions in our docs[1]) support the set of AVX-512 compiler flags we use.
> Therefore, it seems we can simplify our code further by removing the
> "cc_has_avx512" variable.

What about https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90028 ?

You'll need to send a new revision for this series in any case, since
patch 9 broke the crc stuff in the net library.
https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/CAJFAV8w9wYPN+30Hv=batMvP=0M4momKZgmNDFixXbd-9u8t6w@mail.gmail.com/


-- 
David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-25  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-14 17:23 [PATCH 0/3] remove driver-specific " Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] build: add generalized AVX handling for drivers Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] net/intel: use common AVX build code Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] drivers/net: build use common AVX handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:31   ` David Marchand
2025-03-14 17:37     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] remove driver-specific logic for AVX builds Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:44   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] build: add generalized AVX handling for drivers Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:44   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] net/intel: use common AVX build code Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:44   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drivers/net: build use common AVX handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-14 17:44   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drivers/net: remove AVX2 build-time define Bruce Richardson
2025-03-17  9:47     ` David Marchand
2025-03-17  9:50   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] remove driver-specific logic for AVX builds David Marchand
2025-03-18 11:51     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] remove component-specific " Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:34   ` [PATCH v3 01/11] build: add generalized AVX handling for drivers Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:34   ` [PATCH v3 02/11] net/intel: use common AVX build code Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 10:11     ` David Marchand
2025-03-19 11:17       ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:34   ` [PATCH v3 03/11] drivers/net: build use common AVX handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:34   ` [PATCH v3 04/11] drivers/net: remove AVX2 build-time define Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:42     ` Ajit Khaparde
2025-03-18 17:34   ` [PATCH v3 05/11] event/dlb2: build using common AVX handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:34   ` [PATCH v3 06/11] build: add generalized AVX handling for libs Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:35   ` [PATCH v3 07/11] acl: use common AVX build handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 10:16     ` David Marchand
2025-03-19 10:26       ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 10:40         ` David Marchand
2025-03-19 10:59           ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:35   ` [PATCH v3 08/11] fib: " Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:35   ` [PATCH v3 09/11] net: simplify build-time logic for x86 Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 10:24     ` David Marchand
2025-03-18 17:35   ` [PATCH v3 10/11] net: use common AVX512 build code Bruce Richardson
2025-03-18 17:35   ` [PATCH v3 11/11] member: use common AVX512 build support Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 10:27   ` [PATCH v3 00/11] remove component-specific logic for AVX builds David Marchand
2025-03-19 17:29 ` [PATCH v4 " Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 01/11] drivers: add generalized AVX build handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 02/11] net/intel: use common AVX build code Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 03/11] drivers/net: build use common AVX handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 04/11] drivers/net: remove AVX2 build-time define Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 05/11] event/dlb2: build using common AVX handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 06/11] lib: add generalized AVX build handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 07/11] acl: use common " Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 08/11] fib: " Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 09/11] net: simplify build-time logic for x86 Bruce Richardson
2025-03-20  7:46     ` David Marchand
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 10/11] net: use common AVX512 build code Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 17:29   ` [PATCH v4 11/11] member: use common AVX512 build support Bruce Richardson
2025-03-19 18:08   ` [PATCH v4 00/11] remove component-specific logic for AVX builds Bruce Richardson
2025-03-25  7:46     ` David Marchand [this message]
2025-03-25 13:12       ` Bruce Richardson
2025-03-27  8:00   ` David Marchand
2025-03-25 16:02 ` [PATCH v5 " Bruce Richardson
2025-03-25 16:02   ` [PATCH v5 01/11] drivers: add generalized AVX build handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-25 16:02   ` [PATCH v5 02/11] net/intel: use common AVX build code Bruce Richardson
2025-03-25 16:02   ` [PATCH v5 03/11] drivers/net: build use common AVX handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-25 16:02   ` [PATCH v5 04/11] drivers/net: remove AVX2 build-time define Bruce Richardson
2025-03-25 16:02   ` [PATCH v5 05/11] event/dlb2: build using common AVX handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-25 16:02   ` [PATCH v5 06/11] lib: add generalized AVX build handling Bruce Richardson
2025-03-25 16:02   ` [PATCH v5 07/11] acl: use common " Bruce Richardson
2025-03-25 16:02   ` [PATCH v5 08/11] fib: " Bruce Richardson
2025-03-25 16:02   ` [PATCH v5 09/11] net: simplify build-time logic for x86 Bruce Richardson
2025-03-25 16:02   ` [PATCH v5 10/11] net: use common AVX512 build code Bruce Richardson
2025-03-25 16:02   ` [PATCH v5 11/11] member: use common AVX512 build support Bruce Richardson
2025-03-26  9:20   ` [PATCH v5 00/11] remove component-specific logic for AVX builds Konstantin Ananyev
2025-03-26 10:12   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJFAV8ynP9_b7DV=xR_s_b4u5Vkzh9G8ZGHEe8wQ6htGhqvwsQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).