DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>, Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>,
	 Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@intel.com>,
	Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	 Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
	 Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] trace: fix undefined behavior in register
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:49:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8yvVXqnK0mwngjroV-HgtnBpfG50co-3cMgq3AsPLnzgQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250130145849.82003-3-david.marchand@redhat.com>

Hello Jerin, Sunil,

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 3:59 PM David Marchand
<david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Registering a tracepoint handler was resulting so far in undefined
> behavior at runtime.
>
> The RTE_TRACE_POINT_REGISTER() macro was casting the tracepoint handler
> (which expects arguments) to a void (*)(void).
> At runtime, calling this handler while registering resulted in
> reading the current stack with no relation to this function prototype.
>
> Instead, declare an additional inline _register() handler for each
> tracepoint and make sure that the emitting macros in
> rte_trace_point_register.h only work on arguments name and type.
>
> The original tracepoint handler prototype is adjusted by adding a
> __rte_unused for each argument (since emitting macros do nothing
> with them).
> This last part introduces an implementation limit of 15 arguments.
>
> With this change in place, the workaround in dmadev tracepoints can be
> removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>

Can I have your opinion and review on this patch?

Thanks.


-- 
David Marchand


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-07  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-24 16:14 [PATCH 1/2] trace: support expression for blob length David Marchand
2025-01-24 16:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] dmadev: avoid copies in tracepoints David Marchand
2025-01-27  8:25 ` [EXTERNAL] [PATCH 1/2] trace: support expression for blob length Jerin Jacob
2025-01-30 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " David Marchand
2025-01-30 14:58   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dmadev: avoid copies in tracepoints David Marchand
2025-01-30 14:58   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] trace: fix undefined behavior in register David Marchand
2025-01-30 19:10     ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-01-30 21:06       ` David Marchand
2025-02-07  8:49     ` David Marchand [this message]
2025-02-07 11:39       ` [EXTERNAL] " Sunil Kumar Kori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8yvVXqnK0mwngjroV-HgtnBpfG50co-3cMgq3AsPLnzgQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=andremue@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=kevin.laatz@intel.com \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=skori@marvell.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).