From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15971A04FA; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 15:34:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A7D1C1D0; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 15:34:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D73D1C1B3 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 15:34:36 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1580913275; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OVL1QgXCEMHyjTkwYEavdP96Trsq2T/tqEADSyoA0/E=; b=GvcaNFghPgh5vF428aEHnNsKia315bPsWLhK+gbFmHiHlYOGhhEJvp8rhM4FSisCSr7ts3 WDjstvL+UsJHtxE2uQfeY4PTXsh0TSqJYEtFJRRcPj/UkIatMYmIgMYPThWq0P8po30Hpv Ue5rNtMwj+7NzzOCKE78P0g32Q/26YI= Received: from mail-ua1-f70.google.com (mail-ua1-f70.google.com [209.85.222.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-395-berOqWQeOZ-vT6CbGiirbg-1; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 09:34:31 -0500 Received: by mail-ua1-f70.google.com with SMTP id i16so628937ual.5 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 06:34:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q2bEIAez4aK7enfoa9LfydB6GkJMHTqGVy7Tt2C/aYM=; b=sMpIQr92kI34IM/MeGQtlNGgRvDcY8z36OhkVUCJ19Ec653VuXzWzFR44FsTNbwfyi Vt9srmGJZZN3MlhGOF3nrL1e7qriUVEI1GtVBNryDvBSeeqLPvTR9qusTosyJFB8jDF0 FMnXrAlfEMzbGlhwmiJvupFTZ9N4VzPSMZNv+Jbn+6uhk/SRTqFZ0rwOiEZtyvJ5buNg g6HTbASlVL+nKpoxkHSqauLUjr8aqlTxQHe6/kw+foCHa5JubvIZ+q1etpXVNlSchFBZ HbS/0jPDDuK2HpuEvnkBng3bScqXhb9EtR/JsqEdVl9abctf8nO6tx9XiVuN0cuGT1Wd 21zQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWoQ+0KgQikS6O/fY936SR2HhcaWNkkJPLgrYMdD0uW8BxObOWe RK5R9SBvlEpc09sRn10/KzFwpqYjtfyHmXEaVWeCg+EWdoWd0JCsKIipfkKzW5PWqMIg2bd3rx3 /6cMu9TTS+kInTDy3Lpk= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:4104:: with SMTP id o4mr1717845vka.80.1580913270409; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 06:34:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyPPPOCvMzks/43DWD0hGVnhMxn8Hag9RR5ILVwcuDO1tZ6ZmTGmp/39sF/uGK1cLL0QoTvlLdVUSsxDeKA8BI= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:4104:: with SMTP id o4mr1717830vka.80.1580913270022; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 06:34:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 15:34:18 +0100 Message-ID: To: Aaron Conole , Michael Santana Cc: dev X-MC-Unique: berOqWQeOZ-vT6CbGiirbg-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [dpdk-dev] Travis warning about job configs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" While monitoring the newly pushed ABI check in Travis, I noticed that Travis has now a feature to validate the configuration we pass. You can notice a new "Build config validation" box in https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/builds/147554312/config Not sure those warnings are a real issue, but it could become one in the fu= ture. --=20 David Marchand