From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757CA430FE; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 10:47:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453A740695; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 10:47:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF72C400D5 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 10:47:52 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1692953272; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DPMbn2Y6xaVjqSzPOixfP1Q5NVHkmKF5lD0D9Z4VXV8=; b=DQRCJ8VlCqvmqttb1AHbPRCorOrmajD/QKXxAITHdw8II+aMie9Rnc4ZZ3+dmENHKTcD+s hv88B2glKzWCGfEIXPtpnp9jK4KEddjML5YOmU6vGrBgxbpY+/UBwCm5l3fFRcoIvHyJ9m TJ+sep2LaGOiHfB0DakgsUreomZ1tPw= Received: from mail-lj1-f197.google.com (mail-lj1-f197.google.com [209.85.208.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-68-nwiPCFASMAa-HLZ5y_h-Jg-1; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 04:47:50 -0400 X-MC-Unique: nwiPCFASMAa-HLZ5y_h-Jg-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f197.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2bce272ebdfso7532741fa.1 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 01:47:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692953269; x=1693558069; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DPMbn2Y6xaVjqSzPOixfP1Q5NVHkmKF5lD0D9Z4VXV8=; b=RFeX6vdeYwpkGE9NlVfhzZF6s18eafyZy0OnDADAKiKz8wxKgx+hTZtoK3hHmsMyg9 htczSaNeUfeNDv98SKdvw2ldzrtI2kCPK+Jq7LNjbxU4f6If0VNUZKp28buDiIjivFhW K2m4JZB1lih5OlkGwycIHjK0HjAILkZROmhGnNOcIj/Ov0HnRI6oTd3cG04dZprj5WOb Kk50tB/Y25IVUUlrop/u7iFcRbMm9RzwNX1IoeQu+11rFFCUQiLQfHvFLDTVdREQLUP0 J1vuDex1J0habXv/mkErfQx2XdzTJpo5L9JHEubiKa+Ziy0f33HmyHmul2o+o3qBYtlT VFtw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyu8aoDnRR8EwtQyicRJQ6nn5+gRqGUDsFnVl5AltlzxP6B8lm6 eGRJIpg9PG78J1Sy7QkfyY3vfo4glY9OFdboML/Okw7v0OHDZwxYYf4D9i4HaBsFDjn8hdsZkNG O9mXeXzeTyyQVKf20wAA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:34c6:b0:4fe:1dc8:7ec with SMTP id w6-20020a05651234c600b004fe1dc807ecmr10365164lfr.37.1692953269168; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 01:47:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH5g8LadaPJMEOMq044IJHBADJXYBrVfBYH/hg199w2sq4MLKcBzEiD2BtxfefdEvKiEcgd+EDlKB9aj5HqbMo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:34c6:b0:4fe:1dc8:7ec with SMTP id w6-20020a05651234c600b004fe1dc807ecmr10365157lfr.37.1692953268908; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 01:47:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1680558751-17931-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> <1691781658-32520-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <1691781658-32520-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 10:47:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/16] msvc integration changes To: Tyler Retzlaff Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson , Konstantin Ananyev , Ciara Power , thomas@monjalon.net, mb@smartsharesystems.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 9:21=E2=80=AFPM Tyler Retzlaff wrote: > > In accordance with draft plan > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/web/2023-February/002023.html > introduces conditionally compiled code to enable building with MSVC that > _does not_ require C99/C11 meaning it can be integrated now. > > This series covers minimal changes for item #2 in draft plan for EAL > dependencies log, kvargs, telemetry and consumed EAL public headers. > > Note if any patch in the series requires in-depth discussion I'll > detach it from this series for separate submission & more focused > discussion so it doesn't block the entire series. > > Note other "common" intrinsics were investigated for viability but > were not adopted either because they were not available on older > versions of GCC or because they generate different code for msvc > vs GCC. As I mentionned on the prefetch and byteorder patches, I made some adjustments while rebasing the series. Hopefully, I broke nothing. Series applied, thanks Tyler and reviewers. --=20 David Marchand