From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2243A0C53; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 15:47:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8098541134; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 15:47:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F41640E5A for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 15:46:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635950819; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3GtHbr9v3GYhv6tRqDsKycPTkELutlZaJSCtqfAhZrM=; b=I/cyRDM4MpOCyhSTNA4pV9o+vd8H83hWpyoubGCgKNZHptVezutM/J24NAmNPvv8eILmnS n+8AR+qtOx3O0188wGes5Q13gj4vJ+JGQOd5bGKo3tmZy/GXG2wqlfsWOVgsKWxfRo7rhE yfaDjPBTqBiUmI9b66Nnw5a073KLPZs= Received: from mail-lf1-f69.google.com (mail-lf1-f69.google.com [209.85.167.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-472-axCycqTYN6ikpWwrqB3SgQ-1; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 10:46:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: axCycqTYN6ikpWwrqB3SgQ-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f69.google.com with SMTP id br22-20020a056512401600b004017a0f5cc6so528476lfb.16 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 07:46:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3GtHbr9v3GYhv6tRqDsKycPTkELutlZaJSCtqfAhZrM=; b=VGDG2qtlvBa/BRaeR/sT1NLJbuMT4GZTRV4ll0FVUPuwowI7urad9aJQ75E6PzrlQT 337GffwbFpAsFW+5tHmIqmcGW2+iWn/cUmWsD2Gy75w6WMVPDQS3rpRwKHV43XzfCfbl Y/Wqs2wAoHsYyAixxqN07VzE8LQxTqYCvt9TbbHKdH7jy/JXSmkuXAgq4vgNIBFdswIb PKAWyrkj5QknXdfKsQGUcxN87y1CnufXH3fA989rsGGpngmCLqVN/2VwVJfHQO3RGB6c aDX9L1zLoK3v3I4mzpJ45OxD6hew7H/c8ppuJC5Cd9xe+sI2w9lImxAuzQOtOZHlg2fo LIsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530RAuuBAbFiVEwmqo14b28Jc/dvZHp3gCeofwFwU89FgrVs5+yY PZNdAB1R7QoVPvnFgiX6vbu2Qmt/QuqeFEZjpMDzR0hts3VX+viwwKQKAh7uQ4ZaRA6w+5OKRHs qHLZCBwWG7f32bMw5JMU= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9e54:: with SMTP id g20mr2409762ljk.333.1635950811311; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 07:46:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwS9UCdXXXAyTfjHUZSWN12V8zRWuE3l9VZ67aE/EqKuWPAV7/03P0d2GAHH9KAc53nR/tg0G9nigjwJ1w08vo= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9e54:: with SMTP id g20mr2409744ljk.333.1635950811115; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 07:46:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210902053253.3017858-1-feifei.wang2@arm.com> <20211101060007.2632418-1-feifei.wang2@arm.com> <20211101060007.2632418-3-feifei.wang2@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20211101060007.2632418-3-feifei.wang2@arm.com> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 15:46:39 +0100 Message-ID: <CAJFAV8z1-7gNj7WfksGMp8NXJFcX9OXgXbqccjBm=zBqjrVdUQ@mail.gmail.com> To: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com> Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>, Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>, Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/5] pflock: use wait until scheme for read pflock X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 7:00 AM Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com> wrote: > > Instead of polling for read pflock update, use wait until scheme for > this case. > > Jira: ENTNET-2903 I dropped what looks like an internal tag. > Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> > Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com> -- David Marchand