From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871374687C; Wed, 4 Jun 2025 18:02:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DEE42E94; Wed, 4 Jun 2025 18:02:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679BB42E45 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2025 18:02:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1749052969; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RjgDWIHGHp5HRpRS1rTEIDgyIrIKw6/apfEp5F8IXUI=; b=F6QYYKm4/cKmLZGLahDH0dbVCX7j+tZyZ4xAQPB3th992ewMW8S6LcqFHhuiWWlXPfPuG/ XIENAmKpqpoVBI2vPvUv2FqFtZ759AUC0oUSclQijf/Oa0cm0wz9Y02TGgIPqxpeYvb7S9 CjpZZ+be9gi/I0dVM58PBzWN0C6ejz0= Received: from mail-lf1-f69.google.com (mail-lf1-f69.google.com [209.85.167.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-17-KEU8kjKxNnOqAflPc-5TMw-1; Wed, 04 Jun 2025 12:02:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: KEU8kjKxNnOqAflPc-5TMw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: KEU8kjKxNnOqAflPc-5TMw_1749052965 Received: by mail-lf1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5532a2d970fso3712067e87.1 for ; Wed, 04 Jun 2025 09:02:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1749052965; x=1749657765; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RjgDWIHGHp5HRpRS1rTEIDgyIrIKw6/apfEp5F8IXUI=; b=la4EQL2DGSQFEzNJn3eWvjEOVcQaru4bG1jYOROJ7/imMpHi4f0RWa6q+kRfYnD9yb /5OV2jrUVEcuXjirWw9cQ7GC0u/2hx51YBJwwdS6TuJCa9yAR7ujFIwBcQo53mkEfJ9b ZXHMaLysnukqyvKsx4i32XisV45ftbMrGGJvf3p4zZL/I0W9CfDTlg2sfx2V0tEP1/gq EdLvbg+vvH1e/Kl8DGq1Lq9pjWJUlkA3XYv/dv5IzckdobwEc0ez3SJ1nTIlaHOPwfQ1 n/qrTqjW9kc2HlO64wVeqJzHaSHKvtPMpdihG+ofuhrDiE8j6Y8ncNVpqolmeEjKRhkw sZ0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzI1hg/FizTxkezk5B5Ix9+K+wKxzSMEFJdGsEDYcgh3oAEs1cT DjS6HxeSi5DyT5EAWB4WoHTJ+5qMNxCguwmbD535PA0MxpPa4h2Z2Rc/kT2k03yV2YhmlS+4P6T MDbDjlVDDN8kXF6kqBnyJ3NWA7EbE5CEubvwFppOkrTHVNJxG2S+G8gpSPQl9wASi6MSL1gCCBg CT4v4L3idC5TGDDYpXrpw= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct0QrzuBOnNdWyKYNFnNmz9EWcTG6ykRILs2iTTVWyBWG2miMsQ14BrC+NEOLU I3++BDaEycwhBI2Bk9gwmqMnvOpRJFvQnRcJO4tyCq3ESOSKQC5Z+MDipKzI/ktxzSMP+olA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3b0c:b0:553:3586:9aab with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-55356bf96e1mr1204119e87.31.1749052964666; Wed, 04 Jun 2025 09:02:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGo5CNVBMV/9C3KBy+x/fcGXFVlHuwyigRBnnGtZy8HnOKSwvCkOGX12ACb8XTqARqhue0RVO4lnSccQelZ6mc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3b0c:b0:553:3586:9aab with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-55356bf96e1mr1204079e87.31.1749052964182; Wed, 04 Jun 2025 09:02:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250117125912.985475-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20250326171420.2095264-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20250326171420.2095264-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 18:02:32 +0200 X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFsO7IGOLtrmCz8K-OyMvCEkyqqYHUc2nVbuNCIyWbKxZnE28AR3WnEfmtk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] test: improve resiliency of malloc autotest To: Bruce Richardson Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, Chengwen Feng , Anatoly Burakov X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: wjCUe0Pc-2jLojUeTo83Z9UVU7CeP-nPGQ8sRPNA6ds_1749052965 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 6:14=E2=80=AFPM Bruce Richardson wrote: > > The test case "test_multi_alloc_statistics" was brittle in that it did > some allocations and frees and then checked statistics without > considering the initial state of the malloc heaps. This meant that, > depending on what allocations/frees were done beforehand, the test can > sometimes fail. > > We can improve resiliency by running the test using a new malloc heap, > which means it is unaffected by any previous allocations. > > Bugzilla ID: 1579 > Fixes: a40a1f8231b4 ("app: various tests update") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson > Acked-by: Chengwen Feng Applied, thanks. --=20 David Marchand