From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E6CA32A2 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:10:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9892C1E915; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:10:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83BF1E8FB for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:10:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-vs1-f71.google.com (mail-vs1-f71.google.com [209.85.217.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F0D25AFDE for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vs1-f71.google.com with SMTP id i23so5226516vsp.2 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:10:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0frnqA953C1PNJytlX4UAXBEJXxEKmvUq7EFqD2/KJ0=; b=epAJiNMLvn+hKiMNzpRQSXi7GVFXmsB9Bhp3+zBV0yCl6yitdMqo3SZE0P/Un/W/XW GHnTrA1oJhFPWWkri7t507pZOgZZxSWieXB7hRKGI5Aa4hUzUSglbtlzEoiq4ffF0tBr DNWP72qKdzc5NorzFAtnI/zyi02KSP490agw8x1MG7HCAl1AszITeuMCFZ7cPlY8wcWy 5GDIylNJ3Q/ir0UZ7pGyM5OFhGN1umOn809cey24Sno2uanKIDEMwOUhUUaizC14qUte b9Q1r6iHSuJN2Tcl0muYwazggfdCvRP1//D3bFJkVjhTleBl13jgAtgwOBXozhkKXQ9Q 4RSA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX+xGj0DPTXpEQaxQVYBJ3cz8B+d43ObjAMTB1XyX6kVE+LzELO SyfmaL344AaUVUPUlM1Bh5b0wLki7+97ZFqWHCewdt7AqSAb436RzLY8PXd4/2eAdu1psgcA8bj ujemrJW317FI4CGyAXcI= X-Received: by 2002:a67:7d95:: with SMTP id y143mr1596406vsc.39.1571915430373; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:10:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz40zvbf/LW7SlA8j/Su2oYrXjFxqda6Dft2bbSxVbCcSUm33t4Et0Nf78jo+AyGL5km0ObjWBc8hGnabv4Vkk= X-Received: by 2002:a67:7d95:: with SMTP id y143mr1596374vsc.39.1571915429942; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:10:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190930164205.19419-1-ciara.loftus@intel.com> <20190930164205.19419-4-ciara.loftus@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20190930164205.19419-4-ciara.loftus@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:10:18 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ciara Loftus , "Yigit, Ferruh" Cc: dev , Xiaolong Ye , Kevin Laatz , Bruce Richardson , Maxime Coquelin Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] net/af_xdp: enable support for unaligned umem chunks X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 6:45 PM Ciara Loftus wrote: > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_11.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_11.rst > index 06bf57c42..22369107c 100644 > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_11.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_19_11.rst > @@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ New Features > > * Support for pinning netdev queue IRQs to cores specified by the user. > Available for ixgbe, i40e and mlx5 drivers. > + * Enabled zero copy between application mempools and UMEM by enabling the > + XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNKS UMEM flag. > > > Removed Items > @@ -85,6 +87,8 @@ Removed Items > "port config rx_offload crc_strip|scatter|ipv4_cksum|udp_cksum|tcp_cksum| > timestamp|vlan_strip|vlan_filter|vlan_extend on|off" > > + * Removed AF_XDP pmd_zero copy vdev argument. Support is now auto-detected. > + > Caught by Maxime, this part is indented and interpreted as a comment when generating the doc. Ferruh, how do you want to deal with this? I can merge http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/60798/ in master for testpmd. Or you merge it and fix the AF_XDP issue in next-net. Thanks. -- David Marchand