From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CC8A0505; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 08:57:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE2E40685; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 08:57:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B77840042 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 08:57:40 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1649141859; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YxP2KpXW4DGX80QJRSp3ONHc73TWyrtiNMtHhrqP7sM=; b=GJZGyNodi7i/PXcBSFZXXd3vWbfCdR+1HWNsQkn45tpTsZufaLIr5V6Yt6ZmaxzmDkFa+9 YJzk81cVtnLrC9Q/o+0P6+Xt/xq0jApsdNA+ZZQLxC8tzrtrRH+F0Vo6eT3gpIiD59OFmX 4VEF5rGFMZQhxn6D8mn8TxQ6pu3Dc4g= Received: from mail-lf1-f69.google.com (mail-lf1-f69.google.com [209.85.167.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-659-Al-xbu2zOdqyXJSoDyd98w-1; Tue, 05 Apr 2022 02:57:38 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Al-xbu2zOdqyXJSoDyd98w-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f69.google.com with SMTP id g20-20020a056512119400b0044ada577e3dso4377302lfr.1 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 23:57:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YxP2KpXW4DGX80QJRSp3ONHc73TWyrtiNMtHhrqP7sM=; b=YkkgLDyrbfJ6lZu/bMwILUn7thEZbYWpEhAfL2nGXRaBiuakeA8evuFSewRF4Syo+q b88wE2q5d3JcF5qXCNkH4xE7VF0u3519ESPvZ1sf358M97PjuPRCYLWN04VdeSu8FH2+ hvY4NUcOTZ9FinFZ3UXtd4gRQTcuoqNbZsWzu+Tk1rpq5QNvNaHxHEXPuy8qwcJ1rrPk x6/XJecnj762UY96II3NHpeEoeC/LmIhjHiDz3enER6fk9Tv+672nV2MOSSNJZE65Dlm xaOm9crQtB/+3XAKpKO/FGha7anVk59SQJVUQx7dscsKKhKwgLvW4ZnFcy3OghiSGJbi Anfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531MELXb/XihND/EcgshuLnvGJF9fx7hKxHQiA4zaWKKZB4Vj/d9 Vg6CInPe0TllremqaMGpW47Z+TifyoLyzZmWYP7EK+4xx2ATOP3pp5KD1TWY6IBeXFMc/uEeBwf 75bqBCqyUas2Y68fqztw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1326:b0:45a:3a4:f25a with SMTP id x38-20020a056512132600b0045a03a4f25amr1530735lfu.575.1649141857162; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 23:57:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzI7rTjP3MTy3JLbklCrkmxCJfiVfg9KoyxW4UEK+Kbs/WrPqMokhPep02NF1xmYcxCtfwC/kStmulmmahUFDE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1326:b0:45a:3a4:f25a with SMTP id x38-20020a056512132600b0045a03a4f25amr1530718lfu.575.1649141856996; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 23:57:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1649106828-116338-1-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> <2177310.iZASKD2KPV@thomas> In-Reply-To: <2177310.iZASKD2KPV@thomas> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 08:57:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] drivers/baseband: new PMD for ACC101 device To: Thomas Monjalon , Nicolas Chautru Cc: dev , Akhil Goyal , Tom Rix , "Kinsella, Ray" , Bruce Richardson , Hemant Agrawal , mingshan.zhang@intel.com, "Mcnamara, John" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:48 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 04/04/2022 23:13, Nicolas Chautru: > > This serie introduces the PMD for the new bbdev device ACC101 > > (aka Mount Cirrus). This is a derivative from previous Mount Bryce > > which includes silicon improvement, bug fixes, capacity improvement > > for 5GNR and feature improvement. > > Nack for adding this driver. > Afer comparing with A100 driver, it is clear that it can be merged > in the same driver. > Bug fixes and improvements are not justification to create a new driver. I was about to send a similar mail. +1 on this nack. -- David Marchand