From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD87DA0C53; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 08:13:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F9E40E0F; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 08:13:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A4840E03 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 08:13:35 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635923614; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aeN2tuxDRBq1Y28/aE/Lsx1cld3FDyyjvmeTc9Iz+Zg=; b=L/x0Q0+TWn/t5qzVgacjYdwUmm3EHele/D2xS/Z8DPwlYHG+IMk1GoRnDLlKNREz9pwGEN ZZPG3GZqBJAX5ehdDcBtO6BYvnOA4W5IgPw0UigAwjTFjfCGpfmu2d1NPQaMf1rl7wd29o Pk0DyuGXMnKYdp0yJDxhIpLPDgSs640= Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (mail-lj1-f200.google.com [209.85.208.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-383-oUchmG5YN_io3HKuCQCKEQ-1; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 03:13:33 -0400 X-MC-Unique: oUchmG5YN_io3HKuCQCKEQ-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id m11-20020a2e97cb000000b00212f89f3888so691737ljj.21 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 00:13:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aeN2tuxDRBq1Y28/aE/Lsx1cld3FDyyjvmeTc9Iz+Zg=; b=D7GeG1lVaLjAZLz8Y6D4Hqjqgvv4FyH9lZJtauG0iztsV8Bj5s5wxgmeiJm4LSjJU6 p6VhVa80DHNs+H5tErzHQhB9KjRzotcFwDz7R6Vyns6olwqKTTnpL6RpoGkW5FJ0iTC+ ZxceEWHbGIWujF+jBqzDzn3ML0kx9xn7pJjlBOPstf862msFL+enoZrDFjR9WoIx9JUw UqMbBNUQpxkZWaZQ6hzRmc22FPBoi+ffKmkP1TnMJT0HLwoa9paAP+nWTr5IqBMs17KP NrjocvWwt1Vx5MKAs9gGfibTDZKQqZonaIGtXOx+I0Nx2XIWJ3BZRPDNFd3l2RjFPQj1 VNoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533pcnmorCtavf3P1DhnV3x7AFCAo2ew/fPewLtU1RbGMK5BYZXT opXAt/SWy24WaY7JZNxEuegG4B9gVgIPRazWVO1dJ4aPjLdCdLbwCH9Qe0AGyaD1PN9wWuIXkjz sYjdOqrRnw10y3Pm/MQM= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:901:: with SMTP id 1mr44640540ljj.333.1635923612149; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 00:13:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxKDqeZcJWAu07d35Dbvz3Ph0Mb4f0Sn/CSNyAETJZXIHsqzGTBcU0MC5vIIPIz61pvO2uIaVRjYTgOxgs5+oc= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:901:: with SMTP id 1mr44640504ljj.333.1635923611909; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 00:13:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211101174407.81854-1-hkalra@marvell.com> In-Reply-To: <20211101174407.81854-1-hkalra@marvell.com> From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 08:13:21 +0100 Message-ID: To: Harman Kalra Cc: dev , Nithin Dabilpuram , Kiran Kumar K , Sunil Kumar Kori , Satha Rao , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] common/cnxk: fix device MSIX greater than default value X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 6:44 PM Harman Kalra wrote: > > Handling the case where number of MSIX interrupts are greater > than default value i.e. PLT_MAX_RXTX_INTR_VEC_ID. On PCI probe > device is queried for supported MSIX interrupts, and respective > interrupt resources are reallocated with this value. Same MSIX > count should be used while registering new interrupt vectors. > > Fixes: d61138d4f0e2 ("drivers: remove direct access to interrupt handle") I don't think the issue comes from this change. I'd rather flag: Fixes: 8cb5d08db940 ("interrupts: extend event list") > > Signed-off-by: Harman Kalra -- David marchand