From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36F0A0524;
	Wed,  2 Jun 2021 17:46:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299474069F;
	Wed,  2 Jun 2021 17:46:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E477740689
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  2 Jun 2021 17:46:50 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
 s=mimecast20190719; t=1622648810;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=ai0M4+0Y9/jchSkHgOPJdCMtHpe5M8SOuryzgzasY8Y=;
 b=No1H/TF7HQWZ3rt3xu+chxq3ORLC1X+HA3b+A7eTfXwhdRNBSoGyI3jk93qEAWtkwZeLsq
 ALmD39bykp66IQmkhDZaQ6kzMJteC5/xiIx1an2bq166hE7XFLtoWEMPxqUZqe+nR8IhdH
 uaAIvwJt6geGq6hWAjfgwK/jWCUgobo=
Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com
 [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-306-ymHG-gTGNoOGlNJ3zuQB_g-1; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 11:46:49 -0400
X-MC-Unique: ymHG-gTGNoOGlNJ3zuQB_g-1
Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id
 x76-20020a677c4f0000b0290258a100e1c0so717029vsc.17
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 08:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=ai0M4+0Y9/jchSkHgOPJdCMtHpe5M8SOuryzgzasY8Y=;
 b=Wn9grRceafFwe+pCu5kPW1PUPoVacl7DLWyHrjc0g6cnA1RFlGbVJXtV8eXMC9JcGR
 hr+WjoGAZfpWue6mvxDffvxkBD+IlOy8Q6bf2HFPzUmk+yTEYqNouCGE+bedJLO/Iif9
 9bM3lGeZZvem/Ta4XYVZGUYcyTmeQIuwJ1Jv6SPTVzCI6Dly63zSRY/b1Dp7k+T9ecnT
 3dxD/cyP3pJIbmFLnmDf8NDO80t1Ac1beI8/jgwoGO3UtWuGIAEBqKX2QXOEcIwzFHMK
 QhgryZfEtGX0GYvnifT9stiB/HjdFnj/f4bgQh0JKFPpl8FI5+ED0DDGeZ8kMuYutRp+
 UUqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531jRVyfxLouusbRZXNOLyFLrpNspYAm/zzLgIQzcX614xxs7Dlf
 TxSPj+x8BF39UJSverD3RBqmbFaLE6vogjVSZpX8B5MUtktHD+D41eHSwR5uPA68cOsHyjJLns9
 eB834j4KF61F1n3k+xAw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:67a:: with SMTP id
 z26mr9584099vsf.10.1622648808578; 
 Wed, 02 Jun 2021 08:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxnEAE+ask4pKlMCBoLqdX1hLi4mlf26WiNbeYDLvIgg+JZVI/lY03oxGAM5mYh/qZp3CyvjS+cweMmYmPflS4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:67a:: with SMTP id
 z26mr9584061vsf.10.1622648808379; 
 Wed, 02 Jun 2021 08:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210602095836.24901-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
 <20210602095836.24901-3-david.marchand@redhat.com>
 <CALBAE1MmZbpotdLiuVdFSYeyM7hCU7Tw+UYoGHfYT5n6Z6jQrw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALBAE1MmZbpotdLiuVdFSYeyM7hCU7Tw+UYoGHfYT5n6Z6jQrw@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:46:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zErW9ORREXfBh2oq8Rq5Od93NriNnpgYEhKt21AqWa-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Cc: dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>, 
 Michael Santana <maicolgabriel@hotmail.com>,
 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, 
 Rasesh Mody <rmody@marvell.com>, Shahed Shaikh <shshaikh@marvell.com>, 
 Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>, Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>, 
 Heinrich Kuhn <heinrich.kuhn@netronome.com>, 
 Devendra Singh Rawat <dsinghrawat@marvell.com>,
 Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@marvell.com>, 
 Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>, 
 Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>, 
 Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile <navasile@linux.microsoft.com>,
 Dmitry Malloy <dmitrym@microsoft.com>, 
 Pallavi Kadam <pallavi.kadam@intel.com>
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com;
 auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] eal: handle compressed firmwares
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 1:13 PM Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +static int
> > +firmware_read(const char *name, void **buf, size_t *bufsz)
> > +{
> > +       const size_t blocksize = 4096;
> > +       int ret = -1;
> > +       int err;
> > +#ifdef RTE_HAS_LIBARCHIVE
>
>
> I think, better to have small inline functions for libarchive variant
> vs normal file accessors
> in the group for open, access, read etc to avoid the ifdef clutter and
> manage with one ifdef.

That may be a bit artificial, since there is no reuse of such helpers for now.
I'll have a try and see how it looks.


> > +int
> > +rte_firmware_read(const char *name, void **buf, size_t *bufsz)
> > +{
> > +       char path[PATH_MAX];
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       ret = firmware_read(name, buf, bufsz);
> > +       if (ret < 0) {
> > +               snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%s.xz", name);
> > +               path[PATH_MAX - 1] = '\0';
> > +#ifndef RTE_HAS_LIBARCHIVE
>
> See above

There is nothing to abstract here.

If you don't have libarchive, returning the .xz content to a driver is wrong.
I prefer to leave this block as is.



>
> > +               if (access(path, F_OK) == 0) {
> > +                       RTE_LOG(WARNING, EAL, "libarchive not available, %s cannot be decompressed\n",
> > +                               path);
> > +               }
> > +#else
> > +               ret = firmware_read(path, buf, bufsz);
> > +#endif
> >
>

-- 
David Marchand