From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578C6A0527; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:03:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035C15F18; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:03:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625225F13 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:03:23 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1604937801; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xaj7tKDQOqIULlYDmP2aPgPhU0lkswr9vEoRsNQOFRo=; b=fOOefxLHF6jr3yIYxfk1C/Ciplfp1754YDnXYXn5PWc+lPTXRVfQv0hWoq1itKTschurpU 91LzUsNa2f1xo5cDQcaH8ssN9ulpfB/XUr5KHv9fdPImbNFfrUcsfCgrkm+GF+bLc0eK0W wBVyuPVlmp4Dgy46Y6Qh+gY9Gy20bdM= Received: from mail-vs1-f69.google.com (mail-vs1-f69.google.com [209.85.217.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-281-KTLKcUz7M_aamfO-Npbbfw-1; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 11:03:18 -0500 X-MC-Unique: KTLKcUz7M_aamfO-Npbbfw-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f69.google.com with SMTP id t18so2032294vst.3 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 08:03:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xaj7tKDQOqIULlYDmP2aPgPhU0lkswr9vEoRsNQOFRo=; b=Q0eUPDMVIdvUhmSvHpSVanYvZ0fTLKgf/9ku3uYju1F6lDG92B241GsoGVisD9Krbe jEOZxGldKBcKQzpQvlD1fSRjHKgCydl66Mn9jOHOWMfY2N5BOpQvV/WOzUbcHW5vs8pK ZpWTK459slpUxvXfzHkUSEd8RIlI5QDIJeXZVboMZ1DdkUKFk+HI+cB170dSHhZSLCFq YJZZm9hZzi3kMxe8zO2vKpnm4V3pSpUndsXof8RaIPtm5/s7cOyj9fT1RpRsdGO4kz4U 7fRYFDlu7U5W5VpnCeigdV7I+Mm/YRcXa6WA9oFe4Edh9L+y50DIMGg/9KVBp7EmIbyH MSGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339vlXAqna9Aw/mGN0HLrpdKcCJhZVeNyOaBGgaCTAoGR7E0qCw aRN3OeB/Sr8JePikwRYVlVIkuuGztvAVpWJ/DPH7RAaEqC7kDh1kFw2/PBP3lTpRkPQKFL7hM1x EabMM/op7rXv8xto/Ri4= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f8c5:: with SMTP id c5mr8647092vsp.18.1604937798372; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 08:03:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSFYPuC+FmPVPtk7uhAkN3dvKtPxXdfAsB7PQJ/96sXZyddDkRBxj8tkmzDMIYLAi9WHCAAowplY+qoWvBWuk= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f8c5:: with SMTP id c5mr8647020vsp.18.1604937797734; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 08:03:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200922143202.8755-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20201105223602.5965-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20201105223602.5965-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20201109134931.GG831@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> <20201109075440.44130509@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20201109075440.44130509@hermes.local> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:03:06 +0100 Message-ID: To: Stephen Hemminger , Thomas Monjalon Cc: Bruce Richardson , dev , Luca Boccassi , Gaetan Rivet Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/6] eal: replace usage of blacklist/whitelist in enum X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:55 PM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > This patch causes build failures which persist until patch 3, because of > > these deprecations. I think you need to define the backward-compatibility > > macros here, but only mark them deprecated at the end of the set. > > > > /Bruce > > Is building without warnings in every step that important? > The previous patch series for master/slave had the same effect Thomas fixed it while applying. https://patchwork.dpdk.org/cover/80987/#122107 -- David Marchand