From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427C2A0A0E; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:09:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28EB641122; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:09:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64DD4067E for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:09:32 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1619680172; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YQwrVA6r7GMaw4lfBXfx6T8UObaTpi5hpXM0IKN2/9k=; b=YfrqIdEEVuwiJaI2vW/T7WaF+h4vecG6aP6CFhuCG9LuJxbViHSbcIeXQmjGpgEuPVSeqX /ZtmGHSrNzNFesWqJN2uVWhFfLPBq+Rxo5wMszFtYm3z+0MSV153BGKEDjt3ctFJNDLMGu 4desr+Mv8xSDRnrBo4l2l4gXFImUTqg= Received: from mail-vs1-f69.google.com (mail-vs1-f69.google.com [209.85.217.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-17-ZLp-omW4Mmqv6GGtSDSgKQ-1; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 03:09:30 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ZLp-omW4Mmqv6GGtSDSgKQ-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f69.google.com with SMTP id m21-20020a67e0d50000b0290225977f4553so4917903vsl.10 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:09:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YQwrVA6r7GMaw4lfBXfx6T8UObaTpi5hpXM0IKN2/9k=; b=Z5+KhdEFrXzkwGAQZmHehVg2B2LD0sYr0rtGSyZIankhmdx67YZ2kqMENdiFLpwTOp jFYvDc5W5lm1t/rbijF+riz9UctNzUZgHxS8bGeCuUQFEBijzhpPOLqFu6XbFzhmJm4z 6uRVJTpppJ2getcx2L34TeLSC9BbemXfGyh/qdwjv/zw+IvoLHDd+KEypkejkjEKvB3p 0L6zcDkV191sfN8r0k15izmxnXNUu0b4zHTFV49BJdiNMAwtBpPqxKn2Buw6bboYwqOw t5jr3SUq6AnpkCoFKh6wZgn62/0f4S5QEY4IVVLjUzRwZ9rIFR0PYjwUlbvbMj5tACak oueQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533cd8V3FwefjRcZkXHzA9jt8bhAPb07LBNfevBgOXcXG3S+wWe7 nbZSYUQLO3OqnYdsBBWLfViW2nPABg93s/KCB6nLlUCfhEwXMm/BZTz6tKqx9e/4kKtW3izrOYV ELm/rqAYJgIJogjZKcDw= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:368f:: with SMTP id p15mr22004533uap.41.1619680169812; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:09:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbWyrmWSNmuy3cFjuWXD+0TyqlEgX/6A3GLRF/4mq8cpt4aDyLBxOESsWtxfjLBgpm5IIyPSJtsS6pFSJhMuw= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:368f:: with SMTP id p15mr22004526uap.41.1619680169630; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:09:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210428160807.17191-1-thierry.herbelot@6wind.com> In-Reply-To: <20210428160807.17191-1-thierry.herbelot@6wind.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:09:18 +0200 Message-ID: To: Thierry Herbelot Cc: dev , Thomas Monjalon , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Ruifeng Wang Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config/arm: restore support for Qualcomm servers X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 6:09 PM Thierry Herbelot wrote: > > Like for other Arm chips, the 'soc' entry is also needed. Please spare some time to explain the reason why it is needed. > > Fixes: fddbe822c3eb ("config/arm: add Qualcomm") This is not the right Fixes: line, since the soc notion in config/arm/ is fairly recent. Probably: Fixes: f2340c858046 ("config/arm: add platform config option") We have a list of supported socs in doc/guides/linux_gsg/cross_build_dpdk_for_arm64.rst. It is already out of sync, I sent a fix for this. For now, please add this soc in the documentation. -- David Marchand