From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA9AA04B5; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 20:43:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394292BEA; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 20:43:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C074E2BD5 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 20:43:16 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1603827795; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vFf7tihqXLdHuGt2bWHKalmaXegEWzCQD9daCsm3w2A=; b=YZv8wZeCcXkVb+hrZAkdSzLdK+PSfoxccuRfwqgbLU8JCPzJAn3FQ/Xo6g6tGUAJB19zMO phXYDhFN6E/IsHjtlTXeg58QYVl4d5gsz7UTgITDUCQ2D1xuVD7owzETBPBwZr1ngYp8FU QmV94eCEB0mXO8ch4OMC5RYeKlSrP+4= Received: from mail-vs1-f70.google.com (mail-vs1-f70.google.com [209.85.217.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-165-l---WMIkNROR6DmKclR7Vg-1; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:43:13 -0400 X-MC-Unique: l---WMIkNROR6DmKclR7Vg-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f70.google.com with SMTP id g5so585024vsg.14 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:43:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vFf7tihqXLdHuGt2bWHKalmaXegEWzCQD9daCsm3w2A=; b=t+2xtF5LUrIMRrZKB3v3615+f2aL2OQFJR5FUjBsL8ldunI2ALFiOAu5SZLEjZM1f+ omnbbukdnETysqimaAeuC5BuJ0jI0/re+U5VDMp/5dQ2d4pH4F6JqygP8rtvq40eQdz+ pnufxnDhmknETM1eX7WnPll7abcQe1fo4Kr9H0xh1yKOCTJSBykq7pBNiyhaxyq8Y6pK PPZB7XhH9gSJbyvrxIUSnGn2O2As5BOwzA4v9XAst2ngnePmPGRorbySFatqFv9MQR5C o92zIR6AzK4FJBI0lFP2KMaU+nvAHgLZAK9Os0DnOLspAJBbqe7WuDQNAajNMLay4TpI L8ww== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533x8rOGm5uZc2z1WmMFjqDItwBRl6kZcNZbJhtQny57uixQ4iCd YnkbXl6M/IdAzXTzmQaj53oUfx1t4tH4hRLoo1zEdN2e1+aNu58DEVNfvboc6JUlD+fkRV3Qd1+ hxkx9DGoDGfywcC4fZ3o= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:6014:: with SMTP id u20mr3186155vkb.9.1603827792960; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:43:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzblj4np+vsNkSYbYHpq8TqhH49ItYFBFm7a/UryVVTszGghu030gYiG3m5H4PB9WcrSLxgF3gFwGTkZ1z3WIU= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:6014:: with SMTP id u20mr3186144vkb.9.1603827792710; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:43:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201023080058.13335-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20201023080058.13335-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 20:43:01 +0100 Message-ID: To: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Sunil Kumar Kori Cc: dev Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Rework CTF event description storage X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 10:01 AM David Marchand wrote: > > Following recent increase of an internal array that was limiting CTF event > descriptions, I had a second look at the code. > All of this is slow path, so I see no reason in keeping this limitation > and we can go with dynamic allocations. > > While at it, I tweaked the metadata file output. > > I consider this -rc2 material. Comments? Thanks. -- David Marchand