From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A609A04DB;
	Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:48:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDFC1EFF6;
	Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:48:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E4F1EFF5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:48:01 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
 s=mimecast20190719; t=1602863280;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=2ybaTZ2qOboUfyM0GZrW4n5WpzhiLme5cIBNiLW2hKI=;
 b=gwMuvXBj/JT2ek2sojy+Lxb2+MTkDOycCQl4EFvnIYPeIlM6W4O6ev2cv90S+kZ3cl5DNL
 NsBNIFgG2RPyQQGMCej9UYN6XtKpfWFdV7cwsFJQWxzAsztFsTJWpBc2xYNJyLisLvMu2u
 V+0TxTmQTw/wRzXtrwSETalAGZv1H8Q=
Received: from mail-vs1-f70.google.com (mail-vs1-f70.google.com
 [209.85.217.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-108-mHI4xAsaOFCsevDK8IfTWw-1; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:47:58 -0400
X-MC-Unique: mHI4xAsaOFCsevDK8IfTWw-1
Received: by mail-vs1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 7so438515vsu.23
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 08:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=2ybaTZ2qOboUfyM0GZrW4n5WpzhiLme5cIBNiLW2hKI=;
 b=b0XlNLF7T4XiogRt3UlgeGhFwFBzQdyZGn+HITxh8nrpvKPa/4N3LOs9OFi290but9
 FXoSl14f1g/2/I2ktWzr43h3/8+lIwmCHZUZrYfokvXi8ZD1+09ErocV2BdHvSt61axi
 y9sTGpzakR9p5fEw+74o4oqZyQ7A/WJhDh5OcusOfePvpRN1uyo+ty/aH3fTUq99xp4G
 IwbY7gsidU1tl03Jdo4AwBEUvrlDgPHXqenNEptKVdnpiitukCG6cANUXnkEZRDSiqOw
 yi1ZCmhNUaPFmphIFTCcVvNPUggk5jiKb6FjIzYAHDaIOc0tsJBAx86loyEQPiZXlHSG
 xPow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533G5q5JwWAFB7vUyY4vn2BVklFq+g+wFBDIZDGv3Re4xN9u3HYY
 ETsV8HA4RCmkf4gIhARdyJ+hQa6vS3rygEie5CrlNI0oz1N40qDS+3+GJiglWuseC4IZSAizuwN
 QrFpQHApP0e6A+4FZPLk=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:7313:: with SMTP id v19mr2215298uao.87.1602863277917; 
 Fri, 16 Oct 2020 08:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzTT6tA6ttiEPrHVp2IodMbyzjJdi/raRffNh1ItIwhdl4piNaOE6wGJDU2dyrPOa12vCR/ndIp+cEay1Nj63Y=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:7313:: with SMTP id v19mr2215282uao.87.1602863277619; 
 Fri, 16 Oct 2020 08:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200825114447.135030-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
 <20200903144942.671870-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200903144942.671870-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:47:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zP0+Ge5JE+N_8TwVxoPwXBJWcJBtshToqh-=NicAp+yw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Ma Lihong <lihongx.ma@intel.com>, 
 Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com;
 auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Allow overriding of build-time
	constants
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hello Bruce,

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 4:50 PM Bruce Richardson
<bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
>
> A number of the more advanced DPDK build settings which are not expected to
> be user modified are stored in config/rte_config.h. In some cases, for a
> custom build a user may want to override those settings via CFLAGS, so we
> need to ensure that the definitions do not override the user-provided
> values.
>
> Bruce Richardson (3):
>   config: remove explicit undefinition of unset values
>   config: allow overriding some build defaults
>   doc: add notes on overriding extra config values

$ CFLAGS="-DRTE_MAX_MEMSEG_LISTS=64" meson setup
--default-library=shared --buildtype=debugoptimized
-Dprefix=/home/dmarchan/git/pub/dpdk.org/build/install build
$ ninja-build -C build -j4 install


librte_eal.so is indeed built with the 64 value:
$ pahole -C rte_mem_config build/install/lib64/librte_eal.so |grep memsegs
die__process_function: tag not supported (INVALID)!
    struct rte_memseg_list     memsegs[64];          /*   136  8704 */


But no trace of the custom value for external applications:
$ grep -r RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_LISTS build/install
build/install/include/rte_config.h:#ifndef RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_LISTS
build/install/include/rte_config.h:#define RTE_MAX_MEMSEG_LISTS 128
Binary file build/install/lib64/librte_eal.a matches
Binary file build/install/lib64/librte_eal.so.21.0 matches

I can see the same using the meson option -Dc_args.


-- 
David Marchand