From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB9FA0543; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 11:32:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F6D40150; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 11:32:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFB5400EF for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 11:32:13 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1655112732; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Epu029jqm7hV1gei1g0B0K1F7TYdnVe8GqXUjbC8mJw=; b=ccWi5k4Xzoqm/hiIDjfgwfmbGgVd0PtZsYFBWt5+1485gkg/UC2K4AMxehdI5kUcob5eIa lQASHCp82GG5SULV9xqD7LQCUfcKr1AGMvURtmBSpHkjcyIatNQXlOwemBexGzY8EaLOHB cBVBuh4cqWFgAcqKOvrXU/6z4jevgoI= Received: from mail-lf1-f72.google.com (mail-lf1-f72.google.com [209.85.167.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-331-qaTD7tQpOPqghm5CxjIG6Q-1; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 05:32:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: qaTD7tQpOPqghm5CxjIG6Q-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f72.google.com with SMTP id bq13-20020a056512150d00b0047908a2e33cso2808945lfb.16 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 02:32:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Epu029jqm7hV1gei1g0B0K1F7TYdnVe8GqXUjbC8mJw=; b=jjlYovV8yfjPcfh8V0/ksjlThmTM4daNaDTT4b9+vn1GixSqfqh8eLyepqERmcOmYW Pb347ru/JxZQX4EElcMKE14abcSWEIegW2/kSmvB0HlLqbyoAfNiF8H93mZLFacHq3aM 43f3Z8dNj/99zcRyUo4afeq9i6D5AOp/kDW2bxqyXLNZoxSpADjWs0EzkE5cA7b1urfD SEiqzl6cLwuE24wkXOuT5JIKrcsS9ZIhpan9YNmA9GX5yRAD8XNWibjUhqwIYRAYBuXm Rzz3fpEve3WDD/J65fylYNwXv/pjqam3TrTbMRTrSjOSMCtV5XOnoauy6yO8T/bKtoiu WNzA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qcQfMXppV/VwaC/md/uXIpPPiz/31dQVD4daRGzkFce+YpKtV KVVtUhKT6pL0jEjOA+0AJmCOZgKsktD6XJP4ah6+SPBk3E1vhG9IPlXja9iLAgExMw3tqzOe9Qk S7+HSBQagoQRSopoVejs= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:6e0c:0:b0:255:98fb:cb45 with SMTP id j12-20020a2e6e0c000000b0025598fbcb45mr20979352ljc.55.1655112725525; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 02:32:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpKIv+UOwA/C/NqaPyTI2wrHTBTVpOeotKSXbbbjjRGGwLpMtr7YThY4wX2cu4ULBkyDXz5VM+pdPzzlbdjYk= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:6e0c:0:b0:255:98fb:cb45 with SMTP id j12-20020a2e6e0c000000b0025598fbcb45mr20979343ljc.55.1655112725331; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 02:32:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220609134011.725343-1-kda@semihalf.com> In-Reply-To: <20220609134011.725343-1-kda@semihalf.com> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 11:31:54 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] doc: expand description of no-huge and PMD issue To: Stanislaw Kardach , "Burakov, Anatoly" , Dmitry Kozlyuk Cc: dev , upstream@semihalf.com, Heinrich Schuchardt Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:40 PM Stanislaw Kardach wrote: > > Add more details to the description of a known issue of PMDs not being > usable when --no-huge EAL command line parameter is used. The issue > actually happens whenever there is a need for physical addresses, even > when there is no PMD attached. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Kardach Anatoly, Dmitry, opinions? Thanks. -- David Marchand