From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4DDA04B5; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:08:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5F2140CC1; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:08:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02AF8140CB5 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:08:29 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610370509; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HhOAdn6JUeGLhFM7hIhHAwEg08WcPGp/a271KwcghPc=; b=XuSsOaTbARkuH8dhP+oWgGRudP+IEYV8mUH3qjaGcMWnseMty2naNT2nUlQiNzta+zqdJ2 0mIa2m+FvdMG42Hm1A5CrliU9sHDhlt4vYme0c5GvuDCNFoWfouqoN+4rF8xXdmaOKO5qU MbUPC/VpfPnaF7zT1fYZxrn5jCyVqiA= Received: from mail-vk1-f197.google.com (mail-vk1-f197.google.com [209.85.221.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-131-bq_8EPGyPBSUXpUpz8kt9Q-1; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:08:21 -0500 X-MC-Unique: bq_8EPGyPBSUXpUpz8kt9Q-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f197.google.com with SMTP id 84so8131838vkx.1 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 05:08:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HhOAdn6JUeGLhFM7hIhHAwEg08WcPGp/a271KwcghPc=; b=rbCHYYvcuX8qWJjri9C1xAMdf1Upqnsrq6smW1zuQxKPqK9H2FN569ga6D2+D5TbMe reIV20SCKxmgg6w63gnNT3WSQVBzfDzgrKXru2frMLenDP8AYsCNUSG9c97KH8HiIOBb 7z870X5m7HKVOimlbQ4EJhcvtUO+MT4J1P7pSdePS3HbNi5p7uYeqgYY91gWZ/wjifCj V76H63A7fcS9kUvYEWAgMzkI2YO9NMYK5pwDDn5FMjxSqWNS6WPtBfUhJkLypLhMDXcy rdM7iIfIz2Sq1VJ88coDvRDZYu782h5VlMVgjUBh/XvFRbYvH+1kKeGx2OoW2ys8+7eW GMQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531sBjhAsmP5SNmandZ12UqY8AHTV5zl1kpkB+iW01qWfc6HOEP4 YkOzxvxWK2nD7pUrhMdb6Rx323XMWbQZDPXGBeJvK79pTVQGXFdO7oI5nv3Y2wyzhdVFljqHDXI bR7Yo1VyjwwvTDhsD52w= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:44c6:: with SMTP id n64mr11921817uan.53.1610370501161; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 05:08:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzn/zNsGMYxRxwO7gePiuAWGUKqZ5zAfqBBIeFai7GBR1LYzmJZoD129Ci6scu/3sCK2xX8SLJXMbNwSvriuYQ= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:44c6:: with SMTP id n64mr11921799uan.53.1610370500970; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 05:08:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:08:09 +0100 Message-ID: To: dpdklab , Lincoln Lavoie Cc: dev , ci@dpdk.org, Lukasz Wojciechowski , Aaron Conole , David Hunt Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] distributor test failure in UNH CI on ARM X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hey guys, On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:14 AM David Marchand wrote: > UNH CI is raising failures on a ARM server for the distributor test: > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/15077/ > > Worker 59 handled 0 packets > Worker 60 handled 0 packets > Worker 61 handled 0 packets > Worker 62 handled 0 packets > Sanity test with non-zero hashes done > === testing big burst (burst) === > line 258: Missing packets, expected 783 > Test Failed > RTE>> > --- stderr --- Looking at the dashboard, I did not see a passing instance of this unit test for ARM. Did it ever work? -- David Marchand