From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FE7A0A0C;
	Mon,  5 Jul 2021 10:52:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD3340141;
	Mon,  5 Jul 2021 10:52:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5185E4003C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  5 Jul 2021 10:52:07 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
 s=mimecast20190719; t=1625475126;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=FddCVRyGLg/n71qgDPt5sW8wNIofQn8WLugUaJSXPb8=;
 b=ePmTAQRgpOP8ZznFV6FWZt5lMxP7t0ar71UZiCkURJCG9FpXyacSYH4cd3rqV/Lh/wvUXa
 safDkOb08XURvYeALq+Wcwf8hZRf0xsMy8JaVG4kZMN+U6w6oGbNYEmLrT8uWCwNZuCxSU
 AhR4hZqVE2PRKRUzSyahYO+Q6w8SzSc=
Received: from mail-vk1-f197.google.com (mail-vk1-f197.google.com
 [209.85.221.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-582-Umk7I8NrOoCCamgFhIBrFA-1; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 04:52:05 -0400
X-MC-Unique: Umk7I8NrOoCCamgFhIBrFA-1
Received: by mail-vk1-f197.google.com with SMTP id
 o191-20020a1f73c80000b029024d047ad201so4781895vkc.5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 01:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=FddCVRyGLg/n71qgDPt5sW8wNIofQn8WLugUaJSXPb8=;
 b=OlzkdSf8+BfLdV3kU9crzlsp2pf9hzxz2CIl9oIRWVBQ12LdOS64JLNrY035LYXPJi
 LwUiDYBokJd8fczFHUKykYcPHaMWc7TovWaQ/yGzb7W5r64egO2LGW7plToQFYUTXJUA
 q3VA1kKYW0QSa+8JRnLC8Y1QUlhwCt2LmFqIlH0hXlvxe4ZdcnFRV1rTaoZDXkoxrEUX
 7biPbyMyked5viG58NbqcDpA6lz1jCs0zybTS8lY5T/FZOzQnh1PiKRK7X+by8PCgOdG
 9bC/9gBt8rciMQOnq6lAXDIsuhqquIXLqL5wieBdPsXq+T1M23CoiChjO67KnZeDf7YY
 6XZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Y6m8I0e8dGnyHL8QxtKjM9AQX0SueOuo0cJJgcZ0uB8GBxh/M
 iaynsKW2zghW1Zyrg+fsllSZ0DrVUv+/D0Ub4mUcThHlilSSeLG1+FEJAcLghA7tXMq0tQ7S2Fr
 I+Tp37I/huhNPftK4LF0=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:590b:: with SMTP id n11mr5182178uad.126.1625475125272; 
 Mon, 05 Jul 2021 01:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkNerg+X9sJF1X2M1qcymmFyeRC9tp/K5x+yzAeCEJCdofc5hat0CLQtItdbDmusqUe7Lw67/y9/a2Wkg37iE=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:590b:: with SMTP id n11mr5182169uad.126.1625475125079; 
 Mon, 05 Jul 2021 01:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200424070741.16619-1-gavin.hu@arm.com>
 <2370044.79WzprfWfc@thomas>
 <AM5PR0802MB2465E347C949FE179FFC41AC9E5F9@AM5PR0802MB2465.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
 <20248566.ii5BvqWlRQ@thomas>
 <YIvLCnjYxeSMLnKj@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <DBAPR08MB5814D016A6A89B65EB69B5CB985E9@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
 <YIwR2S6BCGntBKPd@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <AM5PR0802MB24652885F87CD9EC56837EB79E579@AM5PR0802MB2465.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
 <YJUVbrQ1a2V24N0j@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <YJUVbrQ1a2V24N0j@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 10:51:53 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zfNNnnGu0OU2y+MPc8-0GZgpsriFeSPh9UkxQGxApPVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, 
 Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
 "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>, 
 "jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com;
 auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Use WFE for spinlock and ring
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:24 PM Bruce Richardson
<bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > The problem is inconsistency in performance on different Arm platforms.
> > > We had decided that each platform needs to enable it after some testing.
> > >
> > > Then it sounds like it does indeed need to be a build option. Does it need to
> > > be added to the meson_options.txt, or can it just be specified in cross-files
> > > and optionally via c_args?
> >
> > Add it to the meson_options.txt is good as the option will be clearly exposed.
> > My concern is more options (e.g. RTE_ARCH_ARM64_MEMCPY) need to be added in.
> > Will the options bloat meson_options.txt?
>
> That bloat would indeed become a concern. We may need to look at more use
> of auto-detection and cross files for such options.

Ruifeng,

This series is blocked on this last topic.
Do you intend to send a n+1?


-- 
David Marchand