From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1D1A0524; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:29:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD941C029; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:29:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3CA1BFE2 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:29:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1595849367; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eiMXeXaodPVVgDZWEguGI8ZD1wHFPM7MlTcpe5npYGM=; b=MsyXiuqY5bY3eNYonr/nJOGwamMn0PlOnURWC3ab3kQ4txVmUikZ68QMokrP1JFS0Gbva/ YNegRfxSeuwxbTY7qwfOptB1ZXtEg4M1KCGwH4uOW7G8IgpJY8uPydgfE9F7ALxzho8sd4 xShrMTh+TFyH1cJd96UiOiQzvgewZy8= Received: from mail-vs1-f70.google.com (mail-vs1-f70.google.com [209.85.217.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-385-C25q5qfoN4-8ssAerPAF4A-1; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 07:29:25 -0400 X-MC-Unique: C25q5qfoN4-8ssAerPAF4A-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f70.google.com with SMTP id w8so582322vsl.21 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 04:29:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eiMXeXaodPVVgDZWEguGI8ZD1wHFPM7MlTcpe5npYGM=; b=Ec0ufOAmU7swMTVKeDQxSdhL0tbjF+qr5/rk2Y5qOi1uF4SIlyVptnppXR5TFxEjRm Zp1lSjw0TnftOcM1r4MoNOwDb4nqTvj1NxR+lN914gJVYLAANR5CjI8v2H3Ksc+RjUkW cttoTXRUMHLgtf4LEmJtk6uASF952PGvS8DRSwOg5Hw5NBzWFghW4cShaXjdpAmDYYbA HtevS37IGioMpxJUBncySlVVx5iwI8H5C32n1fHabdIq9BdOWRIOMrKQ7uVEE9aO2J7H bDbVzHsDwNF/LT5NDJCSAtC29DW/SbqJyfnlauppH9sO3cFIC8WxPdslNeiO+hAvSiOo g1JQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315+jSw+IlXFabQmIYVawuMN6h1GWZAUtycVNxGmQu1fZlnVoX3 inVjlherI/2JBXlT5+6yb60MCgfdqwrA1fRRYeUpKYNkf/etVek7Fnkn5niW0bqUmgM08C2qAyw 6Ey9W65Vym/OqbP4kzSM= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e43:: with SMTP id 64mr1710355vso.198.1595849364705; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 04:29:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNPXPcVO6ombow25tt1QRtBvhOBe0lACanLjsAtCm+NZ9ch+tu7mbMLzydq0aPktyjOYYHDMx7g870XFNqHKo= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e43:: with SMTP id 64mr1710336vso.198.1595849364423; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 04:29:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1595390338-9588-1-git-send-email-wangyunjian@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <1595390338-9588-1-git-send-email-wangyunjian@huawei.com> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:29:13 +0200 Message-ID: To: wangyunjian Cc: dev , "Wang, Yipeng1" , "Gobriel, Sameh" , Bruce Richardson , "Lilijun (Jerry)" , xudingke , dpdk stable X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] hash: fix return value of null not checked X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:59 AM wangyunjian wrote: > The function rte_zmalloc_socket() could return NULL, the return > value need to be checked. > > Fixes: 5915699153d7 ("hash: fix scaling by reducing contention") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Reported-by: Bin Huang > Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli > Acked-by: Yipeng Wang Applied, thanks. -- David Marchand