From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7E8A04BA; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:44:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B78D1D447; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:44:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2FA1D428 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:44:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601657087; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=h1O60Hs0VnWSDDeNX1Iwjm51gLVOH6zD4ZSIo4VSPik=; b=TyBou72aorGnHPRs6t5MC395aQ0gmTVMjXcl8pL4qts+qdqafDPrehPIxORnG6R3/AypIp x8QTH9uiVqzzIG0DYe6y89gqmW61lWGWSTmL+sNYrzjOU91xoGGOVaL98Ts4eVhaD/BU+B RMQoKWBtLASUZaHNJtEgvbQQQVUGpbY= Received: from mail-vs1-f71.google.com (mail-vs1-f71.google.com [209.85.217.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-458-wuZYnjsUOcOrfqBl7boedg-1; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 12:44:45 -0400 X-MC-Unique: wuZYnjsUOcOrfqBl7boedg-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f71.google.com with SMTP id j24so330103vso.6 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:44:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h1O60Hs0VnWSDDeNX1Iwjm51gLVOH6zD4ZSIo4VSPik=; b=Jff+wqr8O3IJStt7j646s+5dSaxqgNmaxE6u6R+o2/5VHhQXeshkF7t4tYSlapPDbx 23oOrXPgdaJyaJ0iz4lpYwTrcZycEkD6Q3x1knbDyMDyVmCzHiT77jP9ClY0UufGut8D 0fmAX0xiSQZksYE2bfADjHTjcjHD4gf7sfaqmtx2BhF/WJly0XqKMiAIi+CfMlK4hiHJ 5wX9H34j3xdHFRPMhogi1UWbtmI2FniDOX0tpdu9Lw/m94bL+6Pm+aqwvJx56czyd6gZ 9QK3/ekco66ajnmI7EBcrRIepIGmbL2Wv9NGpQnLeCjenIVfxQh84TrJQdIoR0CNZSlL 9uEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Ji4KfTxjpk3JHnvrU0uM9IZz9E0ARxnXCTSFrOx9/48AY3h3X 4kFzxkdW9g4nhlRe4DTUE1XWcR8YQtui030hhTDhnWBzSdrvB0vP8HI2ByiMiR2FFHIScjIINYb EKbjNfwz+8OtBcLcYlfM= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9651:: with SMTP id y78mr1814895vkd.22.1601657084982; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:44:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzoNsCHF8KQlZ5FS5TVgeoHmix4tPOJQZXZNPbdveMCGIWNHYRp9c8HHB4h1MMe1VbaXnAzF0VeZSQkjSxUNPU= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9651:: with SMTP id y78mr1814884vkd.22.1601657084749; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:44:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:44:34 +0200 Message-ID: To: Brandon Lo , dpdklab@iol.unh.edu Cc: ci@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson , dev , Thomas Monjalon Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:51 AM David Marchand wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 8:24 PM Brandon Lo wrote: > > We have successfully added Fedora Rawhide to our production pipeline > > for Meson compile testing. > > The image for the container will be updated on a weekly basis. > > > > The version of GCC that it is currently running (10.2) catches that > > the drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf.h file redefines > > VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM, originally from > > /usr/include/linux/virtio_config.h. > > I am just giving you guys a heads-up before the failure report catches > > anyone off guard. > > Brandon, > > Before putting this new job online, the build issue should have been > fixed on the dpdk side. > All new submitted series are now getting a fail flag that we must > inspect to check whether it is because of this known issue or > something else. > > Please, disable this job. The vdpa/ifc issue should be fixed in the main branch now (thanks to Maxime). But next-net and other subtrees will still have the issue until they catch on this fix. > > There is also the OpenSuse job failing. > Can you investigate? Still failing. -- David Marchand