DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	 Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/intel/e1000: reduce the optimization level for gcc > 11
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 14:55:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zvhYiOy=PuUctg8N7EyM6asQdDNpnx_Xc+WusCz02L+A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251006124506.388456-1-thierry.herbelot@6wind.com>

On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 at 14:45, Thierry Herbelot
<thierry.herbelot@6wind.com> wrote:
>
> The e1000 PMD stopped working under Ubuntu-24.04 (using gcc-13) when
> compiled with -O3 (default level for all DPDK code). There is a crash
> when starting testpmd:
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0  rte_read32_relaxed (addr=0x1100800e00) at ../sources/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_io.h:290
> #1  rte_read32 (addr=0x1100800e00) at ../sources/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_io.h:345
> #2  e1000_read_addr (addr=0x1100800e00) at ../sources/drivers/net/intel/e1000/base/e1000_osdep.h:106
> #3  e1000_id_led_init_generic (hw=0x1586788c0) at ../sources/drivers/net/intel/e1000/base/e1000_mac.c:1844
> #4  0x000062aaf653c85f in e1000_init_hw_82540 (hw=0x1586788c0)
>     at ../sources/drivers/net/intel/e1000/base/e1000_82540.c:308
> #5  0x000062aaf6db8227 in em_hardware_init (hw=hw@entry=0x1586788c0)
>     at ../sources/drivers/net/intel/e1000/em_ethdev.c:920
> #6  0x000062aaf65340ff in em_hw_init (hw=0x1586788c0) at ../sources/drivers/net/intel/e1000/em_ethdev.c:445
> #7  eth_em_dev_init (eth_dev=eth_dev@entry=0x62aaff346000 <rte_eth_devices>)
>     at ../sources/drivers/net/intel/e1000/em_ethdev.c:314
> #8  0x000062aaf6db8b71 in rte_eth_dev_pci_generic_probe (private_data_size=11240,
>     dev_init=0x62aaf6db8310 <eth_em_dev_init>, pci_dev=0x62ab2853dd90) at ../sources/lib/ethdev/ethdev_pci.h:150
> #9  eth_em_pci_probe (pci_drv=<optimized out>, pci_dev=0x62ab2853dd90)
>     at ../sources/drivers/net/intel/e1000/em_ethdev.c:365
> #10 0x000062aaf646adf5 in rte_pci_probe_one_driver (dr=dr@entry=0x62aaf82d8020 <rte_em_pmd>,
>     dev=dev@entry=0x62ab2853dd90) at ../sources/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c:299
> #11 0x000062aaf6a15f7d in pci_probe_all_drivers (dev=0x62ab2853dd90) at ../sources/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c:383
> #12 pci_probe () at ../sources/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c:410
> #13 0x000062aaf7a485f3 in rte_bus_probe () at ../sources/lib/eal/common/eal_common_bus.c:84
> #14 0x000062aaf670585d in rte_eal_init (argc=argc@entry=146, argv=argv@entry=0x7fffca468898)
>     at ../sources/lib/eal/linux/eal.c:1253
>
> The crash is linked to the use of gcc-13: uner Ubuntu-24.04 testpmd
> compiled with gcc-11 from the same DPDK tree works as expected.
>
> The perfect solution would be for someone to investigate why the
> PMD crashes. However, this depends on Maintainer availability.
>
> A less-perfect solution is to reduce the optimization level
> (like another proposal for net/qede: see Link).
>
> Note: if more regressions are seen in less-frequently used PMDs,
>       maybe we should switch the default optimization level to -O1,
>       (tree-wide) and only rise the optimization level for actively
>       maintained PMDs, which are proven to work as expected with
>       higher optimization levels.
>
> Link: http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20250909054023.3263401-1-thierry.herbelot@6wind.com/
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot@6wind.com>

NAK.
Please RCA this rather than hiding such an issue.


-- 
David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-06 12:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-06 12:45 Thierry Herbelot
2025-10-06 12:55 ` David Marchand [this message]
2025-10-06 13:01   ` Thierry Herbelot
2025-10-06 13:03     ` David Marchand
2025-10-06 13:02 ` [V2] " Thierry Herbelot
2025-10-08  8:38   ` Bruce Richardson
2025-10-08 10:10     ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-10-08 11:25       ` Thierry Herbelot
2025-10-10 13:20   ` Bruce Richardson
2025-10-10 13:23     ` Thierry Herbelot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJFAV8zvhYiOy=PuUctg8N7EyM6asQdDNpnx_Xc+WusCz02L+A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thierry.herbelot@6wind.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).