From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65796A04BA; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:34:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADFB1BA9E; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:34:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8911BA9A for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:34:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602074083; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WCr93ou7Sm0PqnyXzNcKkds31td9jmy0n04qBnjnJd8=; b=ItCzEVZ5QNPzZdk7BWTSajSFzvdkgSHTI5smqMzIVlRgUziv8DvwLBpS7k83cjmAohE76O IMhhk2zP2Q82jyuAiTgZCaEf1JlcJM1SZtBfqcEJ6/5uDlFDj8ayJbn1FfCVLGRiTAFaZC xg9pevxU/wti7gpVYfTK7GFfbtArySc= Received: from mail-vs1-f69.google.com (mail-vs1-f69.google.com [209.85.217.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-592-OG9p9zmPPTOhsVmny03SWg-1; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 08:34:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: OG9p9zmPPTOhsVmny03SWg-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f69.google.com with SMTP id q26so156583vsp.5 for ; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 05:34:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WCr93ou7Sm0PqnyXzNcKkds31td9jmy0n04qBnjnJd8=; b=fJ42y2BgMFIU4Xm6BZnGbnrnCXRJ0s5pexuTsilrU5GXses0obwDAdhX/Sw/vSlQDo aD/Tqj5qMS87wAd04qJGHKaXRjAVzjIoZ32VyNUetX/9uibmQYtouZVW8kPcX5VdOCvU 0Qctd1/R2002UFmkz4MxcF37hztriO2atGnwcrDBNR0DkG92yGKvH2FQj3Y7GDtddRQP 6DIwwvKNpFdWj7gu0UUpwBOwKEy7brNcB+feMA0l1oTkRo/TH+qMtf/aCgXvQRC8Tbaq KywIFqJchfSa/ibfyjifxYcHlxgIjR6hLWu7g6lJqZUQMnsbdeINi0E3QKJrMxk28YvS Ilxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Rnc2jtzh2MHRaMhv1Pkm7yBsSH45uL9+pQHrIAMDnmiEE0V2h 1/2mzPZUCA/Eo6mWxDAid+GpukM6DsLXh8xGqPN0DmhA9tpTe1LcspWs2RDX8WAuLlOOaTm12eS Ur87EqXugJQw06mL8pp8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3029:: with SMTP id v9mr1402911vsa.5.1602074081227; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 05:34:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNeGGG1vJDvqT/ixXtUo/UlGDa10AgY2fVYC5Y9uO0pml3BQZ/erc15A4ISbGYKSI9ND9usa5klJxEpIRNT1E= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3029:: with SMTP id v9mr1402896vsa.5.1602074080963; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 05:34:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1601928154-26051-1-git-send-email-timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:34:29 +0200 Message-ID: To: Sunil Kumar Kori , Timothy McDaniel Cc: Jerin Jacob , dev , Erik Gabriel Carrillo , Gage Eads , Van Haaren Harry Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/1] eal: increase TRACE CTF SIZE to recommended size X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 12:07 PM Sunil Kumar Kori wrote: >> it is on a slow path. 448 is OK. > > > >Ah yes, this is for the ctf description. > >Could it be changed to rely on dynamic allocations and we simply remove this > >limit? > Changing it to dynamic allocation is difficult because if we do this then every time memory is to reallocated. > So IMO, It is okay to keep it static with enough size. Ok. I will take this as a ack from both Jerin and you and push with the suggested commitlog. -- David Marchand