From: "Martinx - ジェームズ" <thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>
To: "Rosen, Rami" <rami.rosen@intel.com>
Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Can't build DPDK-16.04 on CentOS 6.8
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:15:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJSM8J2v=NYE8Es-C4P4qWjAMY_TcK8=_WZk_OOptGm2=CchWg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9B0331B6EBBD0E4684FBFAEDA55776F92CD5CBC7@HASMSX110.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 12 June 2016 at 11:30, Rosen, Rami <rami.rosen@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Thiago,
>
> > Any clue?
>
> Sure. This is the reason: in dpdk-16.04/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio we
> have:
> ....
> #ifndef PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE
> #define PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE 16
> #define PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_LOWER_ADDR 0
> #define PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_UPPER_ADDR 4
> #define PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_DATA 8
> #define PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL 12
> #define PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT 1
> #endif
> ...
>
> The root cause of the problem is due to that in CentOS 6.8,
> PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE is defined; this
> causes *avoiding* having the PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT definition as
> shown above.
>
> The definition of PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE is due to the following patch, which
> was introduced in CentOS 6.8, which moved PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE from the
> inner drivers/pci/msi.h header file into include/linux/pci_regs.h,
> The linux/pci_regs.h is included in the pci.h header, which is used by the
> igb_uio.c, which failed in compilation.
>
> "PATCH 1/8] PCI: MSI: Move MSI-X entry definition to pci_regs.h"
>
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.h
> @@ -6,12 +6,6 @@
> #ifndef MSI_H
> #define MSI_H
>
> -#define PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE 16
> ...
> ...
> ...
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/linux/pci_regs.h
> index 455b9cc..acfc224 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci_regs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci_regs.h
> @@ -307,6 +307,13 @@
> #define PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL (1 << 14)
> #define PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_BIRMASK (7 << 0)
>
> +/* MSI-X entry's format */
> +#define PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE 16
> ....
>
>
> http://linux-pci.vger.kernel.narkive.com/cZquopIw/patch-1-8-pci-msi-move-msi-x-entry-definition-to-pci-regs-h
>
> See also:
> rpm -qp --changelog kernel-devel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64.rpm | grep "Move
> MSI-X entry"
> warning: kernel-devel-2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA1
> Signature, key ID c105b9de: NOKEY
> - [pci] msi: Move MSI-X entry definition to pci_regs.h (Myron Stowe)
> [1288629
>
>
> A proper patch which checks kernel version can fix it.
>
> Regards,
> Rami Rosen
> Intel Corporation
>
>
Interesting!
Do you have this proper fix? I would like to build and use DPDK on CentOS
6.8...
Thank you for your reply!
Best,
Thiago
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-13 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-01 20:07 Martinx - ジェームズ
2016-06-03 10:45 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-06-03 15:17 ` Martinx - ジェームズ
2016-06-12 15:30 ` Rosen, Rami
2016-06-13 16:15 ` Martinx - ジェームズ [this message]
2016-06-15 18:59 ` Martinx - ジェームズ
2016-06-15 20:27 ` Murali Krishna
2016-06-16 15:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-06-29 2:38 ` Martinx - ジェームズ
2016-06-15 15:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] igb_uio: fix build with backported kernel Ferruh Yigit
2016-06-15 15:59 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-06-16 15:45 ` Martinx - ジェームズ
2016-06-17 9:15 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-06-21 14:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJSM8J2v=NYE8Es-C4P4qWjAMY_TcK8=_WZk_OOptGm2=CchWg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=rami.rosen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).