From: Chao Pei <peichao85@gmail.com>
To: dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] KNI with multiple rxq/freeqs
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:49:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJkE24LBp8qC9MxX4cx7v7PrUHXSoOAzOX5p23XuG-MnBc4gDA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
Currently we are using run-to-complete model with multiple workers in
our project. there is also a KNI running with a fixed ip address. However,
a packet with a destination IP of the KNI may go to any worker that owns a
rxq of the physical NIC(without Flow Director). So all the workers have to
enqueue the packets to the same rxq of the KNI. Which may cause a
performance issue.
I think it's necessary to have multiple rxq/freeqs for KNI, so that
each worker can have its own rxq/freeq. As for txq/allocq, it does not have
the issue I mentioned above.
reply other threads:[~2014-01-22 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJkE24LBp8qC9MxX4cx7v7PrUHXSoOAzOX5p23XuG-MnBc4gDA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=peichao85@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).