* [dpdk-dev] KNI with multiple rxq/freeqs
@ 2014-01-22 3:49 Chao Pei
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Chao Pei @ 2014-01-22 3:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Hi,
Currently we are using run-to-complete model with multiple workers in
our project. there is also a KNI running with a fixed ip address. However,
a packet with a destination IP of the KNI may go to any worker that owns a
rxq of the physical NIC(without Flow Director). So all the workers have to
enqueue the packets to the same rxq of the KNI. Which may cause a
performance issue.
I think it's necessary to have multiple rxq/freeqs for KNI, so that
each worker can have its own rxq/freeq. As for txq/allocq, it does not have
the issue I mentioned above.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2014-01-22 3:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-22 3:49 [dpdk-dev] KNI with multiple rxq/freeqs Chao Pei
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).