From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-x231.google.com (mail-la0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::231]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFA0156 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:59:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id er20so435075lab.8 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:00:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vb9ny+lyTh+ANVQF0Ce7wKFo+T11KzBbmitpZoHbySM=; b=VJDb3PZv3cpqYCAXwGLYLoXhMPnznppDYoZBtjACShIxCzmZVHA8xH0k14yX+mG5g9 q/bKPFjA0u8vqAG/LIf2E2UG2vDy7E43lvCDNKgtYfpoHyT/cbrgDizvPvj2sO+P5SFU W6pS4mxQ2H8YQ959m3ahNsPZXqCmc/yaUYCwn27+paUYbKKeegspEnlsjuffoJKKbZpO ndPd+8tAjNB65I3orFmgoJzK12Aing3PM4fQwc3NbglIx0RKz0nRrEH7CwqXcrTpHhmO Jt6YyPRiy9eoGCw/x5jnWcHvRP93bIojz8x1AuS/5Yb2G+X6PC4PpH4x4a6a6uf4+eBX tczw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.140.137 with SMTP id rg9mr30398448lbb.19.1384354829045; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:00:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.168.98 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 07:00:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20131105122319.GA26200@debian> <20131105160437.GK26200@debian> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 20:30:28 +0530 Message-ID: From: Jyotiswarup Raiturkar To: Vladimir Medvedkin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] pci_unbind.py failure X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:59:34 -0000 Hi all Hi I'm using vmware player , i've using ethernet1.virtualDev = "e1000" Yes I do rte_eal_init() and then rte_eal_pci_probe(). I'm not using rte_pmd_init_all() ; not sure what it does.. Also FYI i'm using DPDK 1.4.1r0 I've finally got real hardware too, will try on the same and update the thread.. Regards Jyoti On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Vladimir Medvedkin wrote: > Hi all, > > I have faced with similar problem on my real environment with 82599 nic. > Looks like in some cases rte_eth_dev_count() return 0 instead of real > number of igb_uio binded ports. After restarting app several times > rte_eth_dev_count() return real number of ports and continue execute > normaly. > > > 2013/11/13 Daniel Kaminsky > > > Hi Jyotiswarup, > > > > Did you initialized all the relevant parts before > > (rte_eal_init(), rte_pmd_init_all() and don't forget > rte_eal_pci_probe())? > > > > Regards, > > Daniel > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Jose Gavine Cueto > >wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > How are you using it? I've successfully used it with vbox. > > > > > > Cheers > > > On Nov 13, 2013 7:17 PM, "Jyotiswarup Raiturkar" < > > jyotisr5@googlemail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > hi > > > > > > > > I got my application running inside a vm (vmplayer) where the VM > > > emulates a > > > > e1000 NIC (82545EM). But rte_eth_dev_count() seems to return 0.. From > > the > > > > website looks like it's a supported NIC . My lspci and pci_ubind > status > > > is > > > > below. Any pointers? > > > > > > > > # ./tools/pci_unbind.py --status > > > > > > > > Network devices using IGB_UIO driver > > > > ==================================== > > > > 0000:02:06.0 '82545EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper)' > drv=igb_uio > > > > unused=e1000 > > > > > > > > Network devices using kernel driver > > > > =================================== > > > > 0000:02:01.0 '79c970 [PCnet32 LANCE]' if=eth1 drv=pcnet32 unused= > > > *Active* > > > > > > > > Other network devices > > > > ===================== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > # lspci -vt > > > > -[0000:00]-+-00.0 Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host > > > > bridge > > > > +-01.0-[01]-- > > > > +-07.0 Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA > > > > +-07.1 Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE > > > > +-07.3 Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI > > > > +-07.7 VMware Virtual Machine Communication Interface > > > > +-0f.0 VMware SVGA II Adapter > > > > +-10.0 LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X Fusion-MPT > > > Dual > > > > Ultra320 SCSI > > > > +-11.0-[02]--+-00.0 VMware USB1.1 UHCI Controller > > > > | +-01.0 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] 79c970 > > > > [PCnet32 LANCE] > > > > | +-02.0 Ensoniq ES1371 [AudioPCI-97] > > > > | +-03.0 VMware USB2 EHCI Controller > > > > | +-05.0 VMware Device 07e0 > > > > | \-06.0 Intel Corporation 82545EM Gigabit > > > Ethernet > > > > Controller (Copper) > > > > +-15.0-[03]-- > > > > +-15.1-[04]-- > > > > +-15.2-[05]-- > > > > +-15.3-[06]-- > > > > +-15.4-[07]-- > > > > +-15.5-[08]-- > > > > +-15.6-[09]-- > > > > +-15.7-[0a]-- > > > > +-16.0-[0b]-- > > > > +-16.1-[0c]-- > > > > +-16.2-[0d]-- > > > > +-16.3-[0e]-- > > > > +-16.4-[0f]-- > > > > +-16.5-[10]-- > > > > +-16.6-[11]-- > > > > +-16.7-[12]-- > > > > +-17.0-[13]-- > > > > +-17.1-[14]-- > > > > +-17.2-[15]-- > > > > +-17.3-[16]-- > > > > +-17.4-[17]-- > > > > +-17.5-[18]-- > > > > +-17.6-[19]-- > > > > +-17.7-[1a]-- > > > > +-18.0-[1b]-- > > > > +-18.1-[1c]-- > > > > +-18.2-[1d]-- > > > > +-18.3-[1e]-- > > > > +-18.4-[1f]-- > > > > +-18.5-[20]-- > > > > +-18.6-[21]-- > > > > \-18.7-[22]-- > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Jyotiswarup > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Cyril Cressent < > > cyril.cressent@intel.com > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:01:06PM +0530, Jyotiswarup Raiturkar > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the quick reply. I saw some definitions of > > e1000_phy_82579 > > > > > hence > > > > > > I thought (hoped) the NIC would be supported. I will try to run > my > > > dpdk > > > > > app > > > > > > inside a VM with an emulated e1000 NIC (just to test the code > ..). > > > > > > > > > > As a general rule, even if you find references to a NIC in the poll > > > mode > > > > > drivers, if it's not listed in > > > > > lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci_dev_ids.h > > > > > then consider the NIC as not supported. > > > > > > > > > > Good luck with the VM, > > > > > > > > > > Cyril > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >