From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f193.google.com (mail-ie0-f193.google.com [209.85.223.193]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF42AFCF for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 00:16:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ie0-f193.google.com with SMTP id rp18so83130iec.8 for ; Fri, 16 May 2014 15:16:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1KEUloLKdCYBtw/G7EfFRdjOqGOItJ8N4UTvnULqFfE=; b=Y34QBYPynS64FyY6L9vHOSZhwoFkBZBsfktBXeDOEM2Ts6m4FnC8ZwV5bwWzxINIUB AH1bOhZr1fOfR7wuUBnYM+52sQuMj/08nAPE90ufnUEpnHdAJpWqVr1m+/NOe1JmOUcj 9G1Z7WZXpIqwzlDNISwcq2SEdVWDKbrrp1dBtHyuOd34ugjWSQDJs8rQTZLRsk8QlGw9 +bV+U773CsOuqSs/pZ1ESzwo82RtmUvuRLVzDnAzjdaHpeKTk5u5YZ5kTnDMMFNRKN6q EGmTJaZWW/tOqk/BUwVFxe8itpOGZf8vWaYiimZ9Y/Uiz7+U1Bq50TLgXjIpqQhVjErC ot/w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.141.232 with SMTP id rr8mr471216igb.48.1400278606288; Fri, 16 May 2014 15:16:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.162.169 with HTTP; Fri, 16 May 2014 15:16:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 18:16:46 -0400 Message-ID: From: daniel chapiesky To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Bare Metal X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 22:16:38 -0000 Hello, [This message was previously sent to "contact us" on 01.org... they directed me to post here instead... ] My company is developing secure networking technology and we are currently building a prototype of our system using the dpdk as the underlying communications platform. So far so good. We are interested in finding out how much we can decrease the attack surface of our application by going full bare metal.. (i.e. sans OS). The mention of a bare metal version of dpdk is one of the contributing factors for our working on our prototype. Can you please provide any information on the dpdk bare metal version? Such as: 1) is it in fact - a zero OS version or is it based on a RTOS such as those from Wind River. 2) Does the bare metal version only support one kind of processor family such as i7, or is it possible to target atom or arm with it as well? 3) what are the licensing terms for it? 4) are royalties required? Thank you for your help in resolving these questions. Sincerely, Daniel Chapiesky