DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: daniel chapiesky <dchapiesky2@gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] to the intel dpdk engineers and all contributors
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:46:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJnwcoPrq-=cO7vWC5CnqYf9-8ObM2ECLb3RqhvV6-96go-EiQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

I just watched the closing remarks by Tim Driscol at the dpdk summit....

http://youtu.be/r-JA5NBybrs

At time 4:30, he mentioned the "shock to the system" of developers
expecting a pat on the back and instead receiving critiques of their
code.....

I realized that I was one of those who failed to acknowledge the incredible
work the Intel Engineers and other contributors have produced.

Please let me acknowledge all of you and your efforts with a few comments:

1) Kudos!!:

2) The Packet Framework made me run around waving my hands in the air
yelling: "This is freaking awesome! I don't have to write it myself!!!"

3) The layered architecture is elegant.

4) Examples???? The examples are wonderful! Those who wrote the examples
are my heroes.

5) Docs? Clear, to the point, and better than the other projects we depend
upon (you know who you are)

6) 6Wind - Thank you for taking on the management of the repository and
website - your coordination effort is truly appreciated

7) Did I say the Packet Framework saved me so much time I was actually able
to cut back my coffee intake by 10%!!!!

8) Windriver - PktGen!!!!!  (though I really want to know more about
mcos....)

Finally,

I recently received a pat on the back for the application I have developed.
In truth, that pat should be passed on, since my application depends so
heavily on DPDK.

Thank you.

I encourage others to let the Intel Engineers and contributors know how
much we appreciate the time and effort they have given to DPDK.

Sincerely,


Daniel Chapiesky
AllSource

             reply	other threads:[~2014-10-15 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-15 20:46 daniel chapiesky [this message]
2014-10-15 21:28 ` O'driscoll, Tim
2014-10-15 22:11 ` Matthew Hall
2014-10-16  1:34 ` Wiles, Roger Keith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJnwcoPrq-=cO7vWC5CnqYf9-8ObM2ECLb3RqhvV6-96go-EiQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dchapiesky2@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).