From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <keren.hochman@lightcyber.com>
Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com (mail-oi0-f47.google.com
 [209.85.218.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FA219F5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:44:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id d191so76815691oih.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 23:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=lightcyber-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=jeokoPt9xVa/bV4z3LxC4cpbYPHu+ChVSDwoa/b7mAA=;
 b=YibE6++rnc+HqFzDzoCKj+x6N89E0ylKnY2MtaIUzalrVBRBZlni+sEa2KzDCx9S1U
 cnY20UBk11NVa0SnyIsXfb7msB9wI1lZ4bIYDFE07Tp1GMVUAGK0Yt7h6Ekd7Vlonrqu
 YoUnGJMULhlQrq/3vRvP4PwzogWxooI+WYErfekc9DW/nB1z1xukG3e5AET+kPIYGm8e
 vzGwDx+zKKyu/WePHcG/7zuUt3mRLJDVVp6tBWfHg22dc1LH+/+tjrDfaFaY8JpkBjrb
 y7XS3qimKiyuOufOuq4c2CdUzT3I+3yuiWH9J8wmJSOTGkhCWoXY5QjqDbHRzCiGqmTc
 U5Gg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=jeokoPt9xVa/bV4z3LxC4cpbYPHu+ChVSDwoa/b7mAA=;
 b=Xg6eRBbYu8o1tthca0gLKpPXxKNQLxZoFRjYchZhtBEMKzCgSNZJv8MWiw0AAV1xeC
 coCmZLc4kzWUbzRbS3PSVdYw25N3cw0LuhvZRaAxHnuq7gXA/KjBL+VHpTjiLD2bdLCk
 GcM7gsDt0i+Bvqclc8Ag4d1Mly9/BYKvClgZcrebf+hnxh3Y8JdWelTic6XUPvP2qKvR
 hKuBog7AZCVnyl0qIzCus4mgmMXXSVXkOAU/waqDjawLLlpFQvGzSC8+eub82oQtJ/AO
 o2TC7EusCqTCZ0J/jR56zpa7OQZyYmIOVhvO4UHZTaq5jrJwx8CsG2FRLOUI1/gQSUOs
 Zuwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMZ9Xlosgsu+Ued6DVR8zESiuYHNO0YrkAjY3pEfynED8S+tbtuO6NEOP5+a+UV0oVGK0SMy1sxAOSkjw==
X-Received: by 10.202.8.67 with SMTP id 64mr25838842oii.139.1473662648854;
 Sun, 11 Sep 2016 23:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.194.199 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 23:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Keren Hochman <keren.hochman@lightcyber.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:44:08 +0300
Message-ID: <CAJq3SQ5q0TbBp763Zhev4iq=cRev+g4VSdNjieUT-QiCJ1-pag@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] imissed in rte_pmd_pcap
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 06:44:10 -0000

Hello,
in the dpdk pcap driver, the imissed indicator of rte_eth_stats structure
is not increasing even when we miss packets since there are no available
mbufs. I looked at the code and I saw that nothing increase it in the pcap
driver code ( as opposed to other drivers where it's being promoted)
Is there a reason for that? Is there other way to follow missed packets
when using libpcap ?
Thanks, Keren