From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D6343CBC; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:26:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFAE42E6B; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:26:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-oo1-f47.google.com (mail-oo1-f47.google.com [209.85.161.47]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2861402CC for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:26:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oo1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5a467dae51dso631537eaf.1 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:26:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1710527201; x=1711132001; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=olT6nBOunk5rycOjqAsxG35FRmmrTSkuvRA6/lUmXE8=; b=Tf1YlQJSkI+6+/IAnHur4EeZrpEQ3dLjiRMHns2aWmJgWL6HAsZpNhpxv8Hc5m0xtY RORok7+5+FUzI/Opa4ktrlFFc0p7g0STWiCakMmR7cF5uNsOcofo/D/U82gDXs2yrNLh UIagTvm2KtyVY10F4n9awLS6EWqrWIKvS4+HU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710527201; x=1711132001; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=olT6nBOunk5rycOjqAsxG35FRmmrTSkuvRA6/lUmXE8=; b=Br0Atn4ntVltvslQTtoUYyRlClkwELYwk4lptYFUiZDiJ0ibwjAUdTHrkKXALP1KRT oF9jGhuhgDMfHmRxx3SSpDC3mI2yz62jGsFLgMWUoghCb45pwqp4NT8rqx5ITthVj2+q OfKHnDC8kpCQn3VuavyW0i5/rdYLfRxUdTU4E5irhc5n+0cLqTWaj8o8tIRbUG+5sX4H hqM9PI4M/yZLVDwuolcbX4RFVxU0Mg5kfUSJ9uv6l2QuD91ChQxnU/uHfbNqQWKlM5jm GfupOk0euEN1zak/FYArvmmpCj3BR4TSH5Kl/fhioAwWgah1peMTNJkaBzsA3UqPrOCH hL/g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXJlddsAFwank1z8QNMafXt2P0TBpogWuEC5iBkKFNmoTu3TW643C5FHu+4mQHaLYfnAVby7QgXfWdEmbY= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxD0QHZSrSFsV+hQ17tpQaNRGCyoe9YnRKoWA0JttpVzBuj8mA8 m8g3T79SzI10Pn+y09itYaCUdCsMK79qUmK6uvVHzAYSCKlSK0h7UWMblThMQIH9OkJOvddlk1P 7O9LDw+Z6Jb4AfFnVhh3amMm6NNyr0pMlBxAnTw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGa+IXm1LNTvy1UWzppKrrpBh5C+L8mUAeDuqLQC3Q05RE0M+KAGYmoJjF29GQ6mpQGU01hqDGeanjffs8+LQU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:1c99:b0:5a4:756e:dd98 with SMTP id ct25-20020a0568201c9900b005a4756edd98mr3717403oob.9.1710527201268; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:26:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20231212153640.1561504-1-brian.dooley@intel.com> <20240312135020.2969533-1-brian.dooley@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:26:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] ci: replace IPsec-mb package install To: "Power, Ciara" Cc: "Dooley, Brian" , Aaron Conole , Michael Santana , "dev@dpdk.org" , "gakhil@marvell.com" , "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , "wathsala.vithanage@arm.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Recheck-request: iol-unit-arm64-testing Even though ipsec update is postponed to a later release, I'm putting in rechecks for all series that have fails for the arm crypto tests now that we are building from SECLIB-IPSEC-2024.03.12.