From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8FF43C5E; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 15:59:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B139E42DF6; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 15:59:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-oa1-f52.google.com (mail-oa1-f52.google.com [209.85.160.52]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B82A42DE4 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 15:59:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oa1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-21edca2a89dso494222fac.3 for ; Wed, 06 Mar 2024 06:59:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1709737168; x=1710341968; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=gumKc9QUgpzCzaXklPoGbisrBeeMqKlDMoZ6Hh4zCJI=; b=JNEokJ5OIrx2fqbn6ivXseq+JogfL84i7X+l743Y9AKx87SBz6sPQhN4bMfz6rVkw1 WibrGtgZHpfeA9vWwiezuzszBC8s8+Pgtdga15nVEmjcYBF4xYpJMawtcEPEMcYbSoOl B3a41Q3dcIMtdPlxbXIIenGDasXao5NakYuyM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709737168; x=1710341968; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gumKc9QUgpzCzaXklPoGbisrBeeMqKlDMoZ6Hh4zCJI=; b=xAHMbCpCyIUko5wj/Wx5nfHOF8+KXJReY7xikn3wDJfEvvLBq/Sc7nmG3bP9PzpvL2 YQqxa+vcEwbYXCi78GNbOmn2DrVwgRk0qp6AdI82oPdZKNJFvx+oE/sI6mI2NgGiNeCH JA4eYcUVCihAFV8HRWjhk8bl0XSMDJzJUD6GAxeZTwMx7Duo9qumxtHS5Ws2b6H15Shk jpbblyHwLj/4b4D8Z5Dgb4MXW3bVUu6LdOj/Ogo1da/SEkKPXsmXK7SaUXHOjU1F8CYD mNNJDqMOtsvQ1no9kqxoymlgKQJb08nHsIL8eKMYo4G9QjWvnTFfNVIeH2XKEvWsvhTC bsJA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVmAr+XsBEmgWimWUsgNLAzRVvcLcZkKHip/wsMvM0hn6OSiuxahbz+U3BZTjQJv4/MBOmK+frma4O3Hl4= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxzxQEvAksgx4fpbT4VJM7FakSBp4RG5ImrrXFbyQLWxYE474DD WmQwiNlwbUBh+wnVlRJNqYvoolCWkGWDfjOQSLd0JaPsZKoc3otN4MrAqDlDMu3UlzObCo+yTCQ u0phfkJVYyyHJoylHSwk80OMiAfXjq6BzAlpi7w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFSeNH9swQZmdN+3CyYzcMYicNBDOGYLP4I989OiveYycn4+ZxULVJRckufnuFkZ55AbQ2yQPWkk3+HMWQK/VI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:a79f:b0:21f:dc6e:e4dc with SMTP id x31-20020a056870a79f00b0021fdc6ee4dcmr5416102oao.5.1709737168412; Wed, 06 Mar 2024 06:59:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20231212153640.1561504-1-brian.dooley@intel.com> <20240305174227.1785111-1-brian.dooley@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 09:59:17 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v5 1/4] crypto/ipsec_mb: bump minimum IPsec Multi-buffer version To: "Power, Ciara" Cc: Akhil Goyal , "Dooley, Brian" , "Ji, Kai" , "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , Aaron Conole , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Sivaramakrishnan, VenkatX" , Wathsala Vithanage , "thomas@monjalon.net" , "Marchand, David" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 6:12=E2=80=AFAM Power, Ciara = wrote: > > > > And this is also failing http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/202= 4- > > March/601301.html > > These need to be fixed in CI infra. > > This function that throws the error is available in the recently tagged 1= .4 equivalent Arm repo, so I am unsure why it can't find it. > Could there be some old installed ipsec-mb version in the environment tha= t is being picked up by DPDK? > Sometimes the meson configure step will pick up the correct ipsec-mb vers= ion, but then ninja step links to an older version that still exists and ha= dn't been uninstalled previously. > Not sure if that could be the case for the CI container though - Patrick = maybe you can verify there are no 1.3 or less versions on system that could= be being picked up: > I usually use something like: find /usr -name libIPSec_MB.so\* We are building the arm ipsec environment from a base debian 12 image. 1. Install NASM 2. Install ipsec 1.4 from the new ARM tag. 3. run DPDK build Thank you for providing the find command to check ipsec version. root@f968452d8612:/# find /usr -name libIPSec_MB.so\* /usr/lib/libIPSec_MB.so /usr/lib/libIPSec_MB.so.1.4.0 /usr/lib/libIPSec_MB.so.1 I assume my reading of the above is correct that only 1.4 is installed. Let me know if it's otherwise though. Thanks! > > > Thanks for the help, > Ciara >