From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015FF43CBC; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:17:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC24402C3; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:17:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-oa1-f48.google.com (mail-oa1-f48.google.com [209.85.160.48]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE03402BC for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:17:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oa1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-221a4f9557dso1372743fac.2 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:17:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1710526653; x=1711131453; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=9k7K3dsvBLoGSBN8M4a89nrdWitCMVkm9WLPrqbEMpI=; b=T6e98pBrBkFThY/KhAKIsIm7LkFN1Q5NnpcVrQxFwLnlXNm9lG/eQC4zaGYtLM8TuD Q9mhhhsyVKU096eP9/cBKxXfvYLb+lNV6IMkoGFHnC5zi1YsaMYbPvKYp/t3T0BTwl34 2ixhlse5o1QWgxnnkl2dXEw+12xPxZWASOEdE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710526653; x=1711131453; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9k7K3dsvBLoGSBN8M4a89nrdWitCMVkm9WLPrqbEMpI=; b=Ok7IY4eP3GL6VPH11apWZD/aIFDceZJCF0IFdDJCs+W67YEkMRsxlH10me+4NkNcsv JxCY2hDovow9S5q+6lJFfRDM1E8bdbVD9/aEabxsAGL2P29uijQQtHGfsTOP5Zg2iAQ9 i90EOhGSndFYQTllQEUJMuy6GEx9MPVmnIzmUgKXg1MrGv1dmhCvqDpn5Tic+GMN/Xqa sKA8qjksbi/oG9e47nQ3XEuRm+aKBlCj5GYJMo7TfReONvIxj0BKGZVETCC7/sqFq2eh V1Nf1w8SjyibijsGwjVeBZMyc+I66ikXFnj3J0VrBmVqYMFPR2OCAEsxRSP/hoDluuDK tnig== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVLFbtvYn2SrDzU+HD+1AGlFC56biHADD7qvvxCkhZawCObjJKyKZZ9SmgeSTHI+tiQSTcTt9I8xY83RNs= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw+vEnsutdaHI7IC1AjBOxGJOp+qxG/CiV/n+tds8+CK66gNeLp iKiRVbEP7SsBv8004JeGs4G2h3lmYuj8VLTr+PSXyUq3aYozKsRvxFuf2zvvoaJlFL/ZkmsruWm lOFdlHlQjCrAV2ovL6tPw9Fv8wc5c1ozZ3RplMQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEW7jX/bWTVarX/u5+Pk0BlpKUiohR0qSTkfd3+5izp6HlCpgJUJqnCy6+UfQBfbjgRmVEQ0IuU2PGgCxHUv3g= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:2404:b0:220:be34:7ee2 with SMTP id n4-20020a056870240400b00220be347ee2mr4922129oap.26.1710526653385; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:17:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240228175250.340922-1-wathsala.vithanage@arm.com> <20240312173316.2701618-1-jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com> In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:17:22 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v3] doc/ipsec_mb: update Arm IPsec-MB library tag To: Akhil Goyal Cc: Brian Dooley , "ciara.power@intel.com" , Jack Bond-Preston , Thomas Monjalon , Kai Ji , Pablo de Lara , "dev@dpdk.org" , Wathsala Vithanage Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 4:04=E2=80=AFPM Akhil Goyal wr= ote: > > > > > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v3] doc/ipsec_mb: update Arm IPsec-MB li= brary > > tag > > > > We are rebuilding from this tag right now. I know the IPSEC update is > > now postponed until after 24.03, but once this install is done, do you > > want me to issue retests for all the recent patches which had failed > > for ARM on this library previously? Then I guess it will be verified > > as you say. > > > Yes, IPsec-mb update is postponed. > But, I remember Bryan highlighted an issue in existing library. > Just wanted to check if this tag can be used in the current release or > Are we good without any changes. Okay, triggered a DPDK main "periodic run" on the CI now that we are running from SECLIB-IPSEC-2024.03.12 and I see it passed. So it looks like this tag can be used with the current release. Otherwise, I will take the opportunity to just trigger retests for all series which failed the crypto tests on ARM in recent weeks, just so we know whether the new library makes a difference (it should), even though the new requirement won't go through.