From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6240443C3D; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 20:50:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D285A402AC; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 20:50:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pl1-f173.google.com (mail-pl1-f173.google.com [209.85.214.173]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB67410D3 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 20:50:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pl1-f173.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1dc96f64c10so56014795ad.1 for ; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 11:50:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1709668230; x=1710273030; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=bM3mV2FzJ9yeopI6y1uVQC7RQg8hGtSjI7dm4ASi/xI=; b=KkhODku/VD8rxReNflFR2BhkUMG447zAvPEr+A00d1Rkbj81v5y9Q2GoBF0h80hMA1 UCRZd1I/Q1s+XafqM4HobYHDtBGqlVEwQf195/Ewgv+T0k0GMs1ahvsZVIHDepsoTPU3 Rv73Tuv8kofnbvjIEBu/+J/yqCbxG2Cz8t0+Y= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709668230; x=1710273030; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bM3mV2FzJ9yeopI6y1uVQC7RQg8hGtSjI7dm4ASi/xI=; b=AFgwg2U/eSk5ETK0SJm2nNZ+qTATuwY4jkfasFh4d7EbHBj18Y0F7WqjR7EgmbdoE2 6BE+YH++VBCyQOoK3lEEVuZ5O/eIVNoxNGHZpMp8RJ66YXxKIkTrltgyh9L8WFQ9kK+M 8gOubPGOhxNU8G2n9GICuBrCd7+k6ivjh5o+/G6Bb7DelwU33vdjz15Ud6SjYJXJnMEh ICjUqKWqapL2/OoJ44czUd5s23LGCBpuoorvORmISc2mSIUCGt7XV2TmPKOin9hYwLbR FIRFhP6dVbWUZh87687AphYIh1oEjOlyB+KkfGHetImEyTvEkxfOezeU3cyI3NvsimJt EEWA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWvkHkpXFJv8J/5cuAd9nXT4xb6+J4o/opVJYAXTqLkq+1i3CQOd2YhXx14a2R6VQbp92Ega8e7/L32nJI= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzpGSyuUpcMROJ1VnmQ7CC0u1VaKuvl/eULPgkNHbjT04FKRG8X eqJCj5VWTCOqY1X/PBWn2YcKLWNTtasAcmg0QRp+hX9ngKvMPxoS7UhXssv8mRfj/nWRgnK/5j4 TzXKgzp9UovSGnoAGG0aqqoc8xbW+UlVbPDczaw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFnLMqXmeWvEinCqXA9wiD2imF5NZ0hnB1PE7SzTCpCcM7W+7NzWlvvV2QqGNDb7UlWFlYEuHhX0z6S+WuaZdE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:d87:b0:29a:ee72:1058 with SMTP id bg7-20020a17090b0d8700b0029aee721058mr10160298pjb.35.1709668230004; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 11:50:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20231212153640.1561504-1-brian.dooley@intel.com> <20240305174227.1785111-1-brian.dooley@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 14:50:18 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v5 1/4] crypto/ipsec_mb: bump minimum IPsec Multi-buffer version To: Akhil Goyal Cc: Brian Dooley , Kai Ji , Pablo de Lara , Aaron Conole , "dev@dpdk.org" , Sivaramakrishnan Venkat , Ciara Power , Wathsala Vithanage , "thomas@monjalon.net" , David Marchand Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 2:11=E2=80=AFPM Akhil Goyal wro= te: > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v5 1/4] crypto/ipsec_mb: bump minimum IPsec > > Multi-buffer version > > > > From: Sivaramakrishnan Venkat > > > > SW PMDs increment IPsec Multi-buffer version to 1.4. > > A minimum IPsec Multi-buffer version of 1.4 or greater is now required. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sivaramakrishnan Venkat > > Acked-by: Ciara Power > > Acked-by: Pablo de Lara > > Acked-by: Wathsala Vithanage > please check these: > https://github.com/ovsrobot/dpdk/actions/runs/8160942783/job/22308639670#= step:19:19411 > Error: cannot find librte_crypto_ipsec_mb.so.24.0 in install Aaron has some questions about whether the upgrade is appropriate or not in another thread. If/when those are resolved, I think he will be able to upgrade the robot to 1.4. > You need to get this fixed or else CI would fail for every patch once thi= s series is applied. > And this is also failing http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2024-= March/601301.html > These need to be fixed in CI infra. For context, we had upgraded a couple weeks ago to tip of main on the arm ipsec-mb repo, and the v4 of this series was passing at that point. https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D31200&state=3D%2A&ar= chive=3Dboth I see that there have been some subsequent commits since then and I see in the other thread Wathsala created a SECLIB-IPSEC-2024.03.05 tag today. We can rebuild from that tag right now and issue reruns. If the updated arm repo resolves the issues seen here, you should see the IOL CI results go green tonight.