From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7409043B31; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 06:01:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16195402B9; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 06:01:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-oo1-f42.google.com (mail-oo1-f42.google.com [209.85.161.42]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E594014F for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 06:01:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oo1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-59ffbff2841so685293eaf.2 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 21:01:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1708491673; x=1709096473; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cEh17NAsQW14j+xyoNWXEzX0L2cEEpi1yTtQlM3qH94=; b=FoswI4vyYyWWxUOmC4/JVNqieG+5W4t7zlCRadhD4SZiUnw/YhRmFLvotnoFSxbaXq FIKfsMS2aIEeAYvLWBNBaHLX3Rm46U1NrsYvl8rD5FeBUYassI5bYR14SfuFp1tfISMd GzRRiyYcavvpcMvY9PxIlcfQKkoV6p4TRD2Tk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708491673; x=1709096473; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=cEh17NAsQW14j+xyoNWXEzX0L2cEEpi1yTtQlM3qH94=; b=XWw14xkvypRumgT88DSKEzsm8gfS2gfzNpUzi5RBZjsvaCwYixddfQowH0rw3+QBDD 7gR7XMIgW1KC8hybgjI//CLXVIaeVFGHDPR8inH4S0fHqr8+wQU7aq05fq4iIJ5fu2e0 sc5Rrt+v+d2ewetxAEONwca/47mVkqvlbgSYf5bkIJKev6V2eC517vKWremCtG5evrrL Q7AVMTFn6RUbUidxZEmO4Pgb11marCnAQKDxxAL/Gssx6PhxlU2J1ImTWMWUYqEmzdeh DTecaozc5Tj6ppRWRuG6NKt04uFUqWn8zSF0VDMlOZa0G3p9xmdUPIsKtgDuDlnekJnR tNqg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUGscYIsd8R7JLlAbQBDNNuokmaY0712JFyRa9POCTpmlt3XQYfWBZB+jokhpnrgoBUMqdqurWdd+wiyMc= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxXdVyahdzQYJp3nDqfIE29kUUIcQGlifHv42hcyEAf9uyt3e+G sPEeDvr2PPMv1MbYzSQQU1Cqtx4lwYMrbjiaKsD4q9nVYfVRZd/L+7LwjckytImB4asIrLblZGI L/rbD/6UZC0qeG7VIT1SvtNbZgL0kVc+KneXNXQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH7pKVxI9Kw9VMRRz/fxSQlA2d6PvaiHm4X68lFgzEwS5mKM/d1Mm6WU45+usiv50wzCbtDXztMeZLp6gwGVU4= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:6542:0:b0:5a0:b31:cc4d with SMTP id z2-20020a4a6542000000b005a00b31cc4dmr2133175oog.8.1708491673550; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 21:01:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230421131221.1732314-1-ciara.power@intel.com> <20230516152422.606617-1-ciara.power@intel.com> <20230516152422.606617-9-ciara.power@intel.com> <112430369.nniJfEyVGO@thomas> In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:01:02 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: set and use session ID To: Fangming Fang Cc: Akhil Goyal , "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , "thomas@monjalon.net" , "Power, Ciara" , Honnappa Nagarahalli , "Ji, Kai" , Ruifeng Wang , "Mcnamara, John" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , "jerinj@marvell.com" , Ashwin Sekhar T K Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004dda9c0611dd37b3" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --0000000000004dda9c0611dd37b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 5:44=E2=80=AFAM Fangming Fang wrote: > v1.4 release on the arm repo breaks DPDK > We have reverted the Arm library version to 1.3.0 to work around this > issue according to Pablo's suggestion. The library fixing this issue is > tagged as SECLIB-IPSEC-2023.06.20. > > Thanks, > Fangming > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy th= e > information in any medium. Thank you. > Does anyone know if there are plans to bring the arm ipsec-mb repo to v1.4, or plans to advance any of the other ideas which were put forth in this conversation? DPDK 24.03 will require ipsec 1.4 or greater, and there is a patch pending to that effect. We do run some testing at the Community Lab on ARM which installs the ipsec-mb library, and runs ZUC and Snow3G autotests with their respective crypto vdev pmds. As noted here the the build fails from the v1.4 tag on arm, and the SECLIB-IPSEC-2023.06.20 cannot be used for 24.03. If it won't be possible to install ipsec-mb on ARM for use with 24.03 I will have to take that test coverage offline. I just want to check to see if there is a workaround I've missed or some planned work on the horizon which will unblock this. Thanks. --0000000000004dda9c0611dd37b3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 5:44=E2=80=AF= AM Fangming Fang <Fangming.Fang= @arm.com> wrote:
v1.4 release on the arm repo breaks DPDK=C2=A0
We have reverted the Arm library version to 1.3.0 to work around this issue= according to Pablo's suggestion. The library fixing this issue is tagg= ed as SECLIB-IPSEC-2023.06.20.

Thanks,
Fangming

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confid= ential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, p= lease notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any= other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in = any medium. Thank you.

Does anyone know if there are pla= ns to bring the arm ipsec-mb repo to v1.4, or plans to advance any of the o= ther ideas which were put forth in this conversation? DPDK 24.03 will requi= re ipsec 1.4 or greater, and there is a patch pending to that effect.=C2=A0=

We do run some testing at the Community Lab on AR= M which installs the ipsec-mb library, and runs ZUC and Snow3G=C2=A0autotes= ts with their respective crypto vdev pmds. As noted here the the build fail= s from the v1.4 tag on arm, and the=C2=A0SECLIB-IPSEC-2023.06.20 cannot be = used for 24.03. If it won't be possible to install ipsec-mb on ARM for = use with 24.03 I will have to take that test coverage offline. I just want = to check to see if there is a workaround I've missed or some planned wo= rk on the horizon which will unblock this. Thanks.
--0000000000004dda9c0611dd37b3--