From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E32F43C5E; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 15:48:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE0E42DE4; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 15:48:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-oa1-f44.google.com (mail-oa1-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FF742DE4 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 15:48:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oa1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-21e45ece781so5029554fac.0 for ; Wed, 06 Mar 2024 06:48:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1709736532; x=1710341332; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=/twENzNKksjzCbn/D7mk37bGIqfpu4GCO57HK11kazw=; b=iDvzYAN7+R2xweVVVpPdBjaiK2/YpmpVD+Zx5wDmj4uBFF7N1Rcuue3F2t1j+fezrA fqjnOYwvtDs0LBmCbON9EsBp5km/GpeMdPXMbfNWGO0LovlCdRsQfHUnFD2D1xjnuWuS GYtkJ3wr3Nbw16qr5PB+gkNTqc6NCKA4mgq3I= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709736532; x=1710341332; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/twENzNKksjzCbn/D7mk37bGIqfpu4GCO57HK11kazw=; b=gFBFeL5E84TQBAW0gdAr1zJddgMNRV83v9hMlgg/t51WD4ZEAogr+Q/8FpJUxh+VKF wjbUmUS1mViP75ZNi34VphXAPOuLQ9WSoLjWnhHkioJy3zDSSPiyuBM39df56F8dagcQ zyb7zMOz7pNij4BN2rGvjmrVInUpcxwgv8HZtBUxU+MD2nFBpsmDjgEYk1o3vhRKWUtF YUWFFU1StN7fFBzsCEc321LfubKkskKUlFngvC+J8BEhrXmJo1yySlOugaOFpnARKLDR yTIGEFvCHms2I6N0DvsPD3MhXtGhSjeUJ2W9zZkhWWqckCM+nlJMfGB5EdYLFaQXQqav wB/A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVRjCJiDOG8OKUfhQr9xbuyEv/5gCeN7Ggj7ZrEp9wQN/K6gJ6+KSvKCJVnoyWjoS2QZbywn+AehXeySVI= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwZPNDNf3mpHaRYkmd4/vgYlJXdcRwQOkJMFb1qJiBkjwbLsuVT mHCnaYSw9UWnRHsbq1f873pKFrrAakLptzbopGcpYDYnmuxeyZTBSW3p9M38ZDvPestJlqdDvQC 7NkdaDC/pY+rG/j574cparHs4xZdgVUdRSZwuxw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFxALruYKoZG6NKhLqaTA67Twk/N+9LFf45mvAjGQr7S1N2dW65bpswxa2nCsj1iIvathmkv05Quc+AgRhtCUc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:612a:b0:220:8cc7:c03d with SMTP id s42-20020a056870612a00b002208cc7c03dmr5406086oae.31.1709736532710; Wed, 06 Mar 2024 06:48:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1709061720-4843-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 09:48:42 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] build eal & ring libraries with MSVC To: David Marchand Cc: Tyler Retzlaff , dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson , ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 5:00=E2=80=AFAM David Marchand wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 8:22=E2=80=AFPM Tyler Retzlaff > wrote: > > > > Enable build of eal & ring library when building with MSVC. > > > > This series depends on 2 other series that seem to be near being > > accepted for merge. > > > > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D31229 > > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D31230 > > > > Since the rc2 deadline is soon this series is being submitted now > > to solicit feedback. The CI is expected to fail without the above > > series being merged. > > > > Series applied, thanks Tyler. > > Btw, I noticed a failure in UNH for MSVC, but it is not reported as > such in patchwork. > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/29302/ > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1709061720-4843-3-git-send-= email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com/ > > Is there something to change in how UNH reports for the MSVC job? Hi David, There was a discussion about this on Slack in the infra-issues space. You can see the correct test report here: https://inbox.dpdk.org/test-report/65deb584.d40a0220.71354.9933SMTPIN_ADDED= _MISSING@mx.google.com/ Which at the time of the discussion was the latest update for the iol-compile-amd64-testing context sent to patchwork. So this appears to be an anomaly. > > > -- > David Marchand >