From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC03469FD; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 14:45:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B032C42E71; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 14:45:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f49.google.com (mail-pj1-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941094025E for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 14:45:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-311c95ddfb5so498845a91.2 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 05:45:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1750337099; x=1750941899; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GwsNQrLp0TKNOsDflh+v49gidpF0ELv6mux3StMclQM=; b=LDguaCMoTJNekevtyULJV12Wp20aAFXpjb4nQ4glUzO5kMezJOFAqjhOmNaH55p922 YappFwiY83MwGVqB/I6rH+1TPKc74qzLjrWDatHf6jfwLZP76aiAlcFhnvt22jaJkzQ2 8fU1QZ26rXaCH5SxnU1HO1M9Q/MzFAlive1YM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1750337099; x=1750941899; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=GwsNQrLp0TKNOsDflh+v49gidpF0ELv6mux3StMclQM=; b=az0Fyi8n86eU5SqxIJpFiiZjs/3NhUiUmK2dK3HLabUNxHUg3G/BYgBEUhoqr/1hMN +pNOYDjq7QvugzvD0GjetTjYxjOiO/WYhL4UTRaNNPV7J88p7cbcsWDMnbDX1ON5sxYH o29JTcVSVXCjQBUAQMkt0jBVYCpfI/Q29vfXEPVl/iaL00IYqxm+jTttn7uBTfS75GCF 2kFgmZ1uzYxzGg96u0SeGaFRHrkWFhtXexqa1V8GUVAnaQmaqqZk21qxhQ8UPiRPwphS t4mZzhk7RUZOquOpT4OryDhpk6jv0fyV8hg6ZdGY3M55GyS9px7liNsBvas+1nVzpy1D r7VA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXu+QN8SrkNxqXtn0TXYo09/05pieis6MPJGRIT2IjPlwxipO6fnJ0PIFc73Lire6RDEp0=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzMsglccssxYlDe/wDBBwJSGm0e+aVrMrx1RTqMGHy1HMtaiOjw T81/avPkHEJaKLxP5z7EhBt6Q7AFNjslH8oHkiwTeyZ08OintsAnYJA2gIwkpilcgzjtzMCUdQ/ ePYDW7K+UleUyQ5yu5P5wvmXcFuPbop/i/5dSaBXTBQ== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvCjTGLqPrXCLqlD5kMD7Dvdf8nwHI9l6HCijRbShMyAuoAQa1Pjd9KY2wxvTq Z3ie33wNrbLcg8wFg+NGo/SJkGh5Ku0EuAOoEhZnfO1F2z8/edrsMKmnPhvceURVWSEeAviwF+1 CWsCajUfvSJ+UsO0fj2RfT9jDZ+T2uVvvh2lUPTVLA231zE9GaQiLOzJc4Fhuk2RUR2vtK36c/g xk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGaASe9H5GUg6FLM/v0Xa4F4nW3jFr/NRyAWdS/0eJBnS/oNmSDN+XKr6gsb2vJbjPJcLJU7wlcgASCph+nq98= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:2e44:b0:313:28e7:af14 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-313f1d5efe4mr28216454a91.19.1750337099585; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 05:44:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <804d43cf-ff73-421b-a3a8-4b3dd3c3add5@arm.com> <20250611140530.51551-1-cfamullaconrad@suse.com> <4c07ffc166d99607736e0396ea01e8264406bd26.camel@suse.com> In-Reply-To: <4c07ffc166d99607736e0396ea01e8264406bd26.camel@suse.com> From: Patrick Robb Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 08:39:40 -0400 X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFuUFhAUWiAqNc21IXiasYhIbIWhMjzh0Di7kc_2cwo3M3L0stXoe5eT8n8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dts: fix deterministic doc To: Clemens Famulla-Conrad Cc: paul.szczepanek@arm.com, nd@arm.com, dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000efc590637ec1de7" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --0000000000000efc590637ec1de7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes the windows failure was unrelated to your patch - sorry about the noise. Looks like Paul has applied this commit to next-dts. On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 4:23=E2=80=AFAM Clemens Famulla-Conrad < cfamullaconrad@suse.com> wrote: > > Thanks. This needs to pass the linter, see my suggestions below. > > Thanks for your suggestions! > > The CI is still failing[1] in "Windows Server 2022" =3D> > dpdk_msvc_compile > I don't see a relation to my change and also other patches show the > same issue[2]. Not sure if I need to do something, do you have an > advice? > > [1] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2025-June/885350.html > [2] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2025-June/885280.html > --0000000000000efc590637ec1de7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes the windows failure was unrelated to your patch - sorr= y about the noise.=C2=A0

Looks like Paul has applied thi= s commit to next-dts.

On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 4:= 23=E2=80=AFAM Clemens Famulla-Conrad <cfamullaconrad@suse.com> wrote:
> Thanks. This needs to pass the linter= , see my suggestions below.

Thanks for your suggestions!

The CI is still failing[1] in "Windows Server 2022" =3D>
dpdk_msvc_compile
I don't see a relation to my change and also other patches show the
same issue[2]. Not sure if I need to do something, do you have an
advice?

[1] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/t= est-report/2025-June/885350.html
[2] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/t= est-report/2025-June/885280.html
--0000000000000efc590637ec1de7--