From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com (mail-la0-f45.google.com [209.85.215.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD131C5F0 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 03:55:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by lahh5 with SMTP id h5so59652671lah.2 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:55:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VHJI6deH3tn/NIQC3Bgh714DpReQfrHT5QUO8y7hVfg=; b=BhaTH+phVff7ul73ThtNqOks8pbyQmhnbEzkbgV45JIKczJUeOw09aDe8R+g7l18/A dV3cTfI0azlANUbzGZqjFU+6yojTX5xNQ0bKV44H2+TaezctgLFhzQQ9RJ6p7NzMRwKK irBk/dLTU8sySBm6FbuRV6TMENJjzi4nd3onR9ZLO6CrPDEkysHGy7fb43Vvngp+JJQz ocy1unLcOvgLZ7dCQ0bYYwt2ER3nBWgqXDzM2/kDuxJjHGbLhZiH0el3zU7+CBKT+NFn RVF2secB1ShO26X0uIMSorS1v64dijGXDsWE90SsR7NL0cVoeSkaWQ8VQuxKIfzs1DdW pTdg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.36.226 with SMTP id t2mr29929924laj.6.1438048535308; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:55:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.190.100 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:55:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:55:35 +0900 Message-ID: From: "EaseTheWorld Mr." To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] KNI example with pcap file X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 01:55:35 -0000 Hello. I'm a DPDK newbie, playing with KNI. I have a packet analysis application like tshark, which receives packets from network interface or pcap file. My plan with KNI is 1) Performance improvement without modifying my program 2) Add ip_reassembly, acl to kni example. (rte_eth_rx_burst -> ip_reassembly, acl -> rte_kni_tx_burst) If input is network interface, I think the plan is fine. but if input is pcap file, is it possible? Should I use vdev or something?