DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keunhong Lee <dlrmsghd@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Could not achieve wire speed for 40GE with any DPDK version on XL710 NIC's
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:06:47 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKBXKmCCPQ0Mw9hZxDn2aRsCySvZW1GwUOXYr0x0tzbWyhrH1w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALgsdbe2-K8buJXz_oQVMaojWaj3G1Z=DHWybn9vRkK7-ZuHJg@mail.gmail.com>

I have not used XL710 or i40e.
I have no opinion for those NICs.

Keunhong.

2015-06-29 15:59 GMT+09:00 Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>:

> Hello!
>
> Lee, thank you so much for sharing your experience! What do you think
> about 40GE version of 82599?
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Keunhong Lee <dlrmsghd@gmail.com> wrote:
> > DISCLAIMER: This information is not verified. This is truly my personal
> > opinion.
> >
> > As I know, intel 82599 is the only 10G NIC which supports line rate with
> > minimum sized packets (64 byte).
> > According to our internal tests, Mellanox's 40G NICs even support less
> than
> > 30Mpps.
> > I think 40 Mpps is the hardware capacity.
> >
> > Keunhong.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2015-06-28 19:34 GMT+09:00 Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> Hello, folks!
> >>
> >> We have execute bunch of tests for receive data with Intel XL710 40GE
> >> NIC. We want to achieve wire speed on this platform for traffic
> >> capture.
> >>
> >> But we definitely can't do it. We tried with different versions of
> >> DPDK: 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0. And have not success.
> >>
> >> We achieved only 40Mpps and could do more.
> >>
> >> Could anybody help us with this issue? Looks like this NIC's could not
> >> work on wire speed :(
> >>
> >> Platform: Intel Xeon E5 e5 2670 + XL 710.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-29 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-28 10:34 Pavel Odintsov
2015-06-28 23:35 ` Keunhong Lee
2015-06-29  6:59   ` Pavel Odintsov
2015-06-29 15:06     ` Keunhong Lee [this message]
2015-06-29 15:38       ` Andrew Theurer
2015-06-29 15:41         ` Pavel Odintsov
2015-07-01 12:06           ` Vladimir Medvedkin
2015-07-01 12:44             ` Pavel Odintsov
2015-07-01 12:59               ` Bruce Richardson
2015-07-01 13:05                 ` Pavel Odintsov
2015-07-01 13:40                   ` Vladimir Medvedkin
2015-07-01 14:22                     ` Anuj Kalia
2015-07-01 17:32                       ` Vladimir Medvedkin
2015-07-01 18:01                         ` Anuj Kalia
2015-07-03  8:35                           ` Pavel Odintsov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKBXKmCCPQ0Mw9hZxDn2aRsCySvZW1GwUOXYr0x0tzbWyhrH1w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dlrmsghd@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=pavel.odintsov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).