From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dlrmsghd@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com (mail-vc0-f174.google.com
 [209.85.220.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EC75946
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:50:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hy4so575394vcb.33
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 03:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=zONXr96e1kf6B8wBriqRqjZSnsSTbtXcGMCyszGzqug=;
 b=qDUxyG21soqddX5zRPNa72R3X0gZiHZJJ+2ZVJNDW6xnVsk6jn2S44V8EUQ7KoupRd
 8lb5lY36O809DrM8Gjri9ZBXDE38CZR0yM+ZsMNx8pGOYvBtfn9ly+Xc3fnBG7BmtTp/
 h+STIsT4enmhNcV6xlyiHz/2fmmsxPLmImsgVnofLkxc2tt3yRkEDzuPuMElSeUjx289
 vJ++j7/nYnXplbdj654mcpPYVD+JPbI89oMd7Rxg7WytjO5R2dfZQHHgRkGXqOzZG0SU
 P6ZtwSsFIEKCKMLypzqaReUWHkirXvVRVRfhRKHWjNxi29j6t0IrhSSqysgJe1nsVjxQ
 6POQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.132.207 with SMTP id c15mr2535632vct.12.1409223258067;
 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 03:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.181.197 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 03:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:54:18 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKBXKmCi1UMBySckOEVurQoS916O-6gMfFpTETOKkkNzj=ZLpA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?7J206re87ZmN?= <dlrmsghd@gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [ethdev] Multiple devices with single PCI
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:50:10 -0000

Hello.
I found that DPDK has an abstraction for having multiple devices with
single PCI.
(RTE_PCI_DRV_MULTIPLE flag)
However, their is a naming collision while registering multiple devices.
Here is my possible solution.

Best regards.
Keunhong.


=====================================================

commit b4fb08c42584283a7c5fbb251ab23f0e2b5f099e
Author: leeopop <dlrmsghd@gmail.com> 2014-07-24 22:28:12
Committer: leeopop <dlrmsghd@gmail.com> 2014-07-24 22:28:12
Parent: bcc733c4780a007f56564277a79309c427367cc2 (ethdev: fix build of
named allocation debug)
Branches: master, github/master

multiple dev support

------------------------ lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
------------------------
diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
index fd1010a..06dda6b 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
@@ -204,8 +204,12 @@
  eth_drv = (struct eth_driver *)pci_drv;

  /* Create unique Ethernet device name using PCI address */
- snprintf(ethdev_name, RTE_ETH_NAME_MAX_LEN, "%d:%d.%d",
- pci_dev->addr.bus, pci_dev->addr.devid, pci_dev->addr.function);
+ if(pci_drv->drv_flags & RTE_PCI_DRV_MULTIPLE)
+ snprintf(ethdev_name, RTE_ETH_NAME_MAX_LEN, "%d:%d.%d-%d",
+ pci_dev->addr.bus, pci_dev->addr.devid, pci_dev->addr.function, nb_ports);
+ else
+ snprintf(ethdev_name, RTE_ETH_NAME_MAX_LEN, "%d:%d.%d",
+ pci_dev->addr.bus, pci_dev->addr.devid, pci_dev->addr.function);

  eth_dev = rte_eth_dev_allocate(ethdev_name);
  if (eth_dev == NULL)