DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keunhong Lee <dlrmsghd@gmail.com>
To: "科来 谭春海" <chunhai.tan@colasoft.com.cn>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] How to set timestamp in 82599 NICs in DPDK?
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 12:48:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKBXKmCvwU3oF9dTLyApHhjLd3pSX6pUydW-CR3cFkCOECtXWA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002a01d09c14$16911430$43b33c90$@colasoft.com.cn>

82599 supports hw timestamping for PTP packets.
I don't know whether it supports timestamping for general packets.


http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c#L640
says that

640 <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c#L640>*
        default:
*641 <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c#L641>*
                /**642
<http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c#L642>*
                 * register RXMTRL must be set in order to do V1
packets,*643 <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c#L643>*
                 * therefore it is not possible to time stamp both V1
Sync and*644 <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c#L644>
*                 * Delay_Req messages and hardware does not support**
645 <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c#L645>
                 * timestamping all packets => return error
*646 <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c#L646>*
                 */*647
<http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c#L647>
                config
<http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=config>*->rx_filter =
HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE;
*648 <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c#L648>*
                return -*ERANGE
<http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=ERANGE>*;
*649 <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c#L649>*
        }*


Keunhong.

2015-06-01 11:38 GMT+09:00 科来 谭春海 <chunhai.tan@colasoft.com.cn>:

> Hi
>
>
>
> I noticed that there is a patch which can set hardware timestamp for the
> received
> packets(
> http://www.wand.net.nz/trac/libtrace/browser/Intel%20DPDK%20Patches/
> hardware_timestamp.patch?rev=ce7153dbc6a13c18bf8033af08c1249527754168),
> but
> it only works in e1000 and igb NICs. I want to capture packets with
> timestamp info in 82599 NICs, what should I do? Could you give me some
> help?
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Chunhai Tan
>
>
>
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-01  3:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-01  2:38 科来 谭春海
2015-06-01  3:48 ` Keunhong Lee [this message]
2015-06-01  3:51   ` Keunhong Lee
2015-06-01  6:39     ` [dpdk-dev] 答复: " 科来 谭春海

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKBXKmCvwU3oF9dTLyApHhjLd3pSX6pUydW-CR3cFkCOECtXWA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dlrmsghd@gmail.com \
    --cc=chunhai.tan@colasoft.com.cn \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).