From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yh0-f43.google.com (mail-yh0-f43.google.com [209.85.213.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414C38057 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:04:03 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-yh0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z6so5615086yhz.16 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:04:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0ZAECT7A6lN1W0duhDyVpSD1fRwUk+msFF9ABYvYCvY=; b=Vsk0+mj4p0TGeP5XCurz+dXgaR/a5OPcHoHNH9XwgG+EnFYK3YenVrrIL8/ExX6nMO y2sdtP7uXD7Q0tVl7xS6G0XtJ2ZNST/Knv+wNSerPxZx3GkgWMty/izRMlorwXxVQOyn lPIAVDXqs8V6XcFQDiUrXwNzNnpBtEfqSvGHCZpuTLdjaVwW2nGSjv1MpF18evml3x3p bCm/iT0DePtNoG/wc7YA7u2zphUZdStfNHEkrYh7oRGynEocMeXH/yvllOFlx2gpgk1y jqV2BdGkPmMVq3/kx1JFctR+JdDRTMKI7cIjyh3lsMq3kKFooiduWh9h2/o1uGvbs8Mh 9JVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlX1HOgIkRkxhIHVjescg339DycTvPpivbrKtV9PaSefEXLcQwNFF5XE9hUiVq8vioORLZa MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.189.148 with SMTP id c20mr23438212yhn.133.1418684642662; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:04:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.129.139 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:04:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1667670.bjMJ8bhPvZ@xps13> References: <6168753.p4Vk7dlKkK@xps13> <1667670.bjMJ8bhPvZ@xps13> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:04:02 +0200 Message-ID: From: Dor Laor To: Thomas Monjalon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Vladislav Zolotarov , Avi Kivity , Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK on OSv (was: RSS for ixgbevf) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:04:03 -0000 On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2014-12-15 22:45, Dor Laor: > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon < > thomas.monjalon@6wind.com > > > wrote: > > > Does it mean DPDK is going to be supported in your system (OSv)? > > > > In general yes. It's premature to ask now since there are components > > that already implemented in OSv and won't be needed (efficient > > producer-consumer, huge pages, etc). We sure like to reuse the driver > code, > > it's a pity not to contribute to the same code base. We'll certainly like > > to let unmodified dpdk apps run as well > > I'm not familiar with OSv but perhaps it has a sense to do an OSv > integration > in DPDK. > We already have directories linuxapp and bsdapp for kernel-specific stuff > like > memory management, PCI access, etc. > Thanks, it will definetly ease the porting > > > Initially we're playing w/ the Linux dpdk on the host and AWS to gain > > familiarity w/ it > > > > > I've seen it in the OSv roadmap. > > > Could we have more details about how it would be integrated? > > -- > Thomas >